Why FCT and what is its purpose?

“Our healthcare is catastrophically dysfunctional.” Scientific American, January 2013
“If there is a dirty little secret in our profession, it is this: there is a paucity of scientific evidence
for most things we doctors do, orthodox and alternative.”
Editor, “Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine” and book author, Larry Dossey, MD.

“The search for truth also implies a duty.”
Einstein

If medicine were an exact science, like physics, this detailed homepage could have been replaced with less than a one-line math formula proving that all the current conventional and alternative integrative approaches cannot possibly solve the epidemics of chronic diseases. Certainly, the underlying deficiencies also lead to the avoidable acute diseases, including seasonal flu, coronavirus, bacterial and other infections. The following synopsis is for those who wish to get a brief grasp, for more detailed information presented further.

Synopsis of the reasons for failure in chronic diseases in medicine:

The answer to these has little to do with medical approaches, all of which justify their use by claiming some science behind them, but exclusively in the nature and definition of science itself. “Science is a seamless web of knowledge in order to understand laws and principles of nature and how to use these best to solve complex problems.”

The key words: “Web”=total pertinent knowledge and “seamless”= free of conflict with other sciences, and this is where medical approaches fall short. The proper knowledge of the web, quoting a Nobel Laureate in physics, late Soviet professor Peter Kapitza PhD, enables to fulfill the first of the two main endeavors in science, “deepen the exploitation of already known.” This allows medicine to become far more reliable, effective and logical even without exactness of math. A good example of this is well reflected by the tragedy of the coronavirus pandemic.

The seemingly correct scientific explanation but based only on one science, molecular biology: “We could not contain the pandemic because of the absence of a pharmaceutical vaccine.” This is true as vaccines do save millions of lives but is only a part of the web.

However, from the rest of it emerges another sound and effective option that can be exploited from knowledge of physics. This offers that: “In the absence of pharmaceutical, molecular COVID-19 vaccine, we can use a submolecular, energetic identity of COVID-19 to produce an energetic vaccine. This, in addition to being protective can also be a curative for carriers and already sick patients. Simple logic from this is amplified if we assign an equal 25% of legitimacy to each key component of this issue: coronavirus molecule, its pharmaceutical vaccine, submolecular energy field of the virus and its energy field vaccine, imprinted in water. Yet, only the first component, carrying its 25% share, has been considered. The conclusion then emerges that the coronavirus pandemic has resulted in the world tragedy not only due to the high virulence of COVID-19, but because it was handled through as much as 75% deficiency in the available options. Can any technology, corporation or military effectively function on only 25% of the necessary knowledge and resources to sustain competition? Besides, another root of the 75% shortage stems also from violation of the “seamless” concept. There the energetic coronavirus homeopathic vaccine could have a good option yet because of the laws of chemistry, such as Avogadro number 1:10²⁴ concerning dilutions, render such vaccines “empty,” or free of active substance, homeopathy has been relegated to “diluted placebos.” However, this notion represents a serious seam with physics that is a virtual supreme court in science that offers higher understanding and explanatory power of nature than chemistry. Physics, that is a virtual supreme court in science, deems homeopathic and digitally imprinted solutions to be biologically active energetic substances. Not surprisingly, the abundance of scientific and clinical data support their actions. The most dramatic among these, a recent successful Cuban trial on as many as 2.5 million people of homeopathic vaccine to prevent the fatal epidemic of leptospirosis. This brought the mortality to zero and hospital visits to virtually none. Yet, this study, for non-scientific reasons, was rejected for publication by conventional peer reviewed journals. Thus, leaving homeopathy in its usual “unscientific” corner and our healthcare thin in its web of options.

The rest of this home page presents facts and reasons for many common, principal deficiencies alike in both conventional and alternative-integrative approaches.

As any website might be the ‘most’ or ‘best’ in something, this website is the most candid and analytical in medicine for explaining reasons for failure in both conventional and alternative-integrative medicines in providing quality care.

The purpose of this program is to finally transform unproductive medical services into high quality reliable science by:

1. placing it on a sound scientific foundation, one of reliable principles as used by the premiere science of all, physics
2. to save alternative-integrative practitioners from wasting significant amount of time and resources in trying to accomplish the impossible – to succeed in reversals of chronic diseases using countless approaches unfit for this. To expose how this industry fools and exploits them, by concealing through hype significant limitations and side effects of these treatments.
3. providing conventional and alternative medical practitioners with fundamental information to reduce the serious gaps in their respective education and services in order to substantially elevate quality of care and reduce astronomical wasteful healthcare costs
4. offering training in effective truly integrative medicine, FCT, that is based on the rigorous scientific standards
5. conducting clinical trials in order to formally establish the efficacy of FCT in a wide variety of chronic and acute diseases
6. returning medicine to medical and osteopathic doctors who have been turned by the pharmaceutical industry into the salesmen and women of its costly merchandise which is incapable of reversing chronic diseases.

This distribution and its mindset doomed them to professional failures and frustrations as well as loss of disgruntled patients to a chaotic and dysfunctional alternative market.*
* While both classical homeopathy and traditional Chinese medicine are no longer capable of reversing chronic diseases in deeply poisoned modern populations, these modalities are excluded from the derogatory references to alternative and integrative medicine.

Laymen who wish to obtain important information about the serious limitations of the majority of ineffective, costly and, often, harmful approaches and products in alternative and integrative medicine are welcome to peruse this information and study the media from this website: DVDs, articles, e-letters, and webinar recordings. These explain the logistics of these failures and present a great variety of medical subjects and diseases. This information offers a significant edifying benefit as the demand for alternative services is as high as their unrealistic expectations. These expectations have not been met even as many patients or families of patients have spent exorbitant resources on “integrative” services particularly for Lyme, autism, and many other diseases. I have seen families become destitute, as the result, and it is about time that the truth concerning the serious limitations of these hyped treatments is to come out.

The necessity of this purpose is

The skyrocketing epidemics of chronic diseases worldwide due to the mistaken century-long experiment by the main medical industry, conventional medicine, to contain these through pharmaceutical agents. As a result, the public has logistically swayed to alternative medicine and a haphazard combination of the two, integrative medicine, which short of sporadic short-lived successes in milder conditions, proved ineffective.

“Medicine has failed in the care of chronic diseases. None of the types of research or clinical trials have made a difference because we have not identified a cause.”
Professor Colin J. Alexander, MD

The reasons for failure

1. The main reason for failure is the inability to determine and treat main causes of chronic diseases due to gross deficiencies in medical education and training.

Deficiencies in conventional medicine

“Mechanistic chemical paradigm failed.”
Two-time nominee for Nobel prize in medicine,
Professor Robert Becker, MD

There is no better way to assure this failure than conventional medical education, since it is void in the information concerning the majority of causes of chronic diseases as well as the proper diagnostic and therapeutic means to address them. This concerns environmental, lifestyle, certain infectious and other important sources of these causes. An education in the main science of the environmental sources of all chronic diseases – toxicology − is virtually nonexistent and from poisoned children to even more poisoned adults everyone is “treated” with just piles of drugs. Even an elementary medical necessity such as a healthy diet remains a mystery in medical education, from pediatrics to geriatrics where, as recently reported by the American Journal of Medicine, the majority of cardiologists do not even know what a healthy heart diet is. (Stephen Devries, et al, A Deficiency of Nutrition Education and Practice in Cardiology, AJM, Vol. 130, No. 11, Nov. 2017). Yet, they are trigger-happy for costly cholesterol-lowering drugs with many side effects. Likewise, physicians readily prescribe glucose lowering drugs for pre- and diabetes type 2, before offering proper dietary, weight loss and exercise regiments, about which they have very vague knowledge.

In alternative medicine

Starting with its top tier – naturopathic doctors – and down the ladder, none possesses the necessary conventional medical knowledge needed to succeed. Even when alternative practitioners stumble on important causes of disease, they do not have enough knowledge to properly manage these within a very complex multisystemic physiologic network of the body, or utilize effective diagnostic tests and treatments. Likewise, an absence of knowledge in toxicology and an inferior one in infectious diseases, which agents cause 100% of all chronic diseases, plus unawareness of potential and limits of, even, their own modalities seal their failures.

In Integrative Medicine

Medical and osteopathic doctors who experiment with alternative approaches are not aware of these handicaps of alternative medicine and blindly consume whatever this cheerful industry offers them. The following is a concrete example of alternative medicine being completely ignorant of the capabilities of its own treatments. In 2015, at the height of the Ebola virus epidemic in the US, I contacted the Office of Alternative and Integrative Medicine under NIH to seek its assistance in treating these patients with the novel FCT version of homeopathy, based on important knowledge of conventional medicine and other relevant sciences. This approach has yielded superior results over the years with treating infections without the use of antibiotics, anti-viral or other antimicrobial drugs. This has been the case with chronic Lyme disease, PANDAS, MRSA, persistent prostate and urinary bladder infections, herpes and HPV, all with known poor outcomes in the use of antimicrobial drugs. To my shocking surprise, the staff advised me that it could not assist me because it was eliminated from the grant program by this office, headed by an MD and run by naturopathic doctors. They obviously were not aware of homeopathy possessing by far the most powerful biological action of all treatments, or the ways it could be effectively used against even the most deadly infections. Yet, grants were available for treatments which qualify for the notorious back rubs and were a waste of taxpayers’ money.

One of many classic examples of this blind-leading-the-blind tandem is a book with the catchy title, Autism Revolution, by a medical doctor ‘open-minded’ to alternative medicine, Harvard autism researcher Martha Herbert MD, PhD. There, she displays the common ‘virtues’ of the current simplistic pharmaceutical medical training by being able to relate only to its alternative, and just as crippled, pharmaceutical siblings. In this case, the sibling is so-called functional medicine which was concocted by a biochemist who does not have even a formal medical education. The chances for successful reversals of chronic diseases, on this basis alone, is as likely as a handyman constructing flying space rockets. It is not a big surprise that aside from functional medicine succeeding only in selling its own line of costly ‘natural’ products devised by the biochemist, I was not able to find a single documented chronic disease reversed by this ‘medicine’. Read the statement of a practitioner who tried to practice this (dys)functional medicine. “I am completely replacing my current method of treatment with FCT. I have been a student of “functional medicine” for years and have never truly gotten the long term results in patients that I expected. While watching the Basic FCT Seminar I knew FCT is what I have been searching for. Thanks again!” Even a lay person, a patient of mine, shared with me that, based on science fundamentals learned from her father, she recognized that functional medicine is just another cleverly designed business and refused it, yet thousands of alternative-integrative practitioners practice it with pride. [For more details on Autism Revolution, see my critique of this book, on Amazon. Information on functional medicine and common deceptive marketing ploys used by the ‘natural’ industry to sell senseless products for exorbitant costs, can be gathered from DVD/USB recording of Dr. Yurkovsky’s seminar, The Extremely Complex Hidden Nature of Chronic Diseases and Proper Bio-Resonance Testing, as the Only Key to Unlock These].

The reasons the open-minded conventional academicians and alternative-integrative practitioners cannot discern the futility of ‘natural’ pharmaceuticals is because that on surface these are based on biology and body chemistry which render millions of material targets among tissues, organs and biochemical entities to be logical targets for pharmaceutical actions and their respective enterprises. However, this took place at the exclusion of other important sciences such as physics and its fundamental concept of energy related to all living concerning the same tissues, organs and biochemistry where, quoting Nobel laureate in medicine, Professor Albert Szent-Györgyi, PhD, “studying the living without the concept of energy amounts to studying dead matter”.

The concept of energy of living cells carries a great practical value for practice of medicine because it allows to finally determine, through Bio-resonance testing that is based on physics, the true causes of chronic diseases inside the very origin of all diseases—internal organs, themselves. Energetic treatment modality, homeopathy, based on physics too, possesses a unique and superior to any other therapy property to deliver strictly specific signals to the body to release, or neutralize these causes. This specificity factor plays a fundamental role in this process and medicine, in general, as confirmed through a specific successful action of conventional vaccines, which had been long preceded by homeopathic vaccines. Yet, while Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy are based on physics, the lack of its proper education in biology has been emphasized by Harvard biology Professor Edward O. Wilson, PhD: “When biologists hear of a string theory in physics they confuse it with violins”. The same holds true for medical doctors. As the consequence, conventional medical literature and the general media disseminate scientifically ignorant statements about homeopathy. One of these was issued by two professors and former editors of the prestigious conventional medical periodical, The New England Journal of Medicine. There, as usual, it was stated that because homeopathic remedies are so diluted that based on chemistry they have to be void of original substance and medicinal action and, therefore, represent placebos. They, also, displayed even more ignorance in science by stating that homeopathy “violates fundamental scientific laws.” (Alternative Medicine – The Risks of Untested and Unregulated Remedies. NEJM, Sept. 1998, Vol. 339, #12).

Do these photos of a recovered infant, within days on FCT homeopathic treatment, after conventional pediatric and dermatological treatments failed, look like the result of a placebo that violates fundamental scientific laws?! How about these photos of the boy who has been cured from incurable autoimmune condition, vitiligo, through the same means? In both cases Bio-resonance testing determined exact causes of these conditions and homeopathic-energetic signals turned the body defenses against these. Likewise, Bioresonance testing diagnosed this patient with worm infection and following just homeopathic-energetic signals, instead of toxic costly anti-parasitic drugs, she released these worms. And has emailed us this photo and comment:

—-Original Message—-
From: Donna
To: Dr. Yurkovsky
Sent: Wed, Jul 30, 2014 10:11AM
Subject: As Requested: Photo of Intestinal Worms Released in July

Hi Dr. Yurkovsky: As requested, I am attaching a photo of worms released from my intestines on July 25, 2 days after I finished my remedies for this month.
See you on August 8th. Donna.

Besides, fundamental scientific laws have been established by physics, not chemistry or pharmacology, and as no surprise, reputable physicists have deemed such ‘scientific’ statements about homeopathy as “distortion of and ignorance in science”. (Rustom Roy, PhD, William A. Tiller, PhD, Iris Bell, MD, PhD, The Structure of Liquid Water; Novel Insights from Materials Research; Potential Relevance to Homeopathy, Materials Research Innovations 9-4: 1433-075X). Among other physicists, Nobel laureate in Physics, Cambridge University Professor Brian Josephson, PhD has expressed the same opinion in defense of homeopathy concerning such ‘experts’. My email to both editors asking them to elucidate the exact fundamental scientific laws in question remained unanswered. This goes beyond just a mistake, but a complete embarrassment reflecting the ignorance of medical doctors in, even, basic principles of science. A brilliant, internationally known British bio-physicist and researcher Mae Van Ho, PhD, referred to the omission of physics from biology and medicine as “excluded biology.” Echoed her another prominent biologist, Cambridge University researcher, Rupert Sheldrake, PhD, referring in his book to medical research excluding physics as The Science Delusion. Unfortunately, the industry has turned the delusion into a gold mine and keeps it alive at any cost, no less than 2.5 trillion dollars annually, while not having a cure for a single chronic disease. At any cost also includes forgery of as many as 50% of published clinical studies, as per the official statistics, with made up positive effects of drugs.

To complete the dead end, the education in both medicines is void even of fundamental criteria of sound scientific theory, which represents the main distinction between science and ‘good ideas’ in pseudoscience. When I once polled a group of integrative MDs and DOs on the subject, no one knew the difference. The absence of this knowledge alone precludes medical practitioners from critical assessment of the true value of medical approaches, treatments and products, that has made it easy for medical industries to exploit them. These black holes in either medicine seal this blind-leading-the-blind tandem in integrative medicine. In a nutshell, the chances for integrative medicine to succeed by randomly combining all of the failed approaches are as high as for a new corporation to succeed by combining bankrupt companies, which have not corrected the reasons for their failure. Still, credit is due to those medical schools which experiment with this program because this is a worthy goal, after all, which FCT has already accomplished. In the meantime, the catchy term, ‘integrative medicine’, which alleges the best of two worlds has been just the opposite due to simple math rendering a higher number of administered blindly actions to exponentially increase their risk of errors, amounting to failure and harm in medicine. This is no different from computer repair men inserting a higher number of screw drivers in it blindly. That is why, at this time, the term integrative medicine has succeeded more in marketing of ‘integrative centers’ than healing their patients.

2. Using formal scientific findings related to disease to conceal the low quality of medical services mislead practitioners and patients concerning.

Most of the time, this constitutes the greatest deceit in the era of modern science since so many ineffective, unnecessary and harmful treatments and products have been used in its name. The misleading is made easy by deficient education in proper science structure, methodology and even ability to properly interpret published medical studies.

A detailed analysis of both medicines, by Professor Ronald A. Koretz, MD, has confirmed the prevailing pattern of false claims, selective reporting of data with rare success cases while silencing prevailing failures, all under a formal cover of science. (Integrative Gastroenterology, by Gerard E. Mullin MD, CH. There is No Alternative to Evidence). He commented on a publication bias, where favorite treatments are readily accepted and hyped, whereas successes of a competition are rejected. Such patterns create unrealistic expectations of many treatments which amount to a mirage, which particularly prevails in alternative-integrative medicine. Professor Koretz noted that practitioners in both medicines are not trained to discern false information reported in many medical studies and that the highly tattooed opinions of experts or specialists actually belong to the lower level of scientific ranking. Whether these opinions are expressed in the media, articles or, even, textbooks is irrelevant. This is useful information, especially for alternative-integrative field that is full of charismatic experts in Lyme, molds, autism, Bio-resonance testing, detoxes and whatever, whose approaches fail in practice. The last doubt in my mind about alternative hype, before studying scientific process on my own, was effectively extinguished by the two ‘holistic’ books which still remain popular and sell primitive treatments. Their author, Hulda Clark, ND, claiming no less than The Cure for All Diseases, and The Cure for All Cancers. Such books, claiming cures, solutions, revolutions, breakthrough or successful 5-7 etc, step programs to anything, from poor memory to hemorrhoids, are very common in health book market. The main lesson I have ever learned from such books is that paper is, indeed, the single most resilient material on Earth, due to its ability to withstand even the most glaring idiocies. As an example, none of the aforementioned ‘cure’ books contained even a single case of anything being cured. Ironically and sadly, but Dr. Clark, proved the real value of her preventive and actual treatment for cancer by dying from it, herself, at the age far below an average life span for a woman. I personally do welcome health books which cover healthy nutrition, exercise, body-mind and other subjects of general healthy hygiene. These are very useful, however whether their authors do not understand limits of these measures, or they try to oversell the message but too often true benefits of these measures are greatly exaggerated. One thing that it is important to wash hands with a soap before eating, but another is to portray this act as a cure and prevention of cancer, heart or any serious disease. I have seen plenty of even young people on perfect diets, rigorous exercise regiments, doing yoga and other healthy things to only fall apart and become invalids, overnight. It is not to discourage from these necessary healthy habits but to only note that an apple a day is far from enough to keep a doctor away.

Concerning scientific process, effective implementation of scientific findings in practice, in reality, is far more prone to failures than commonly assumed automatic success.

“Scientific truth has only a few ways to be expressed correctly, but there are thousands of ways to express it wrongly!
It is easy to take the wrong paths that are numerous,
and difficult to find the few right ones.”
Professor of physics, former MIT researcher,
and author of Schrodinger’s Universe and the Origin of
the Natural Laws, Milo Wolff PhD.

This is because the findings, on one hand, and choosing these for successful medical practice, on the other, belong to two entirely different sciences, operating by different rules and methods. The science that deals with establishing findings is basic research. Yet, its only purpose is to provide individual parts or options for science two, applied science, which attempts to construct or engineer these into successful technologies and scientific theories. Medicine has bundled certain findings in speculations, the best it could, to formally justify tests, treatments and products as scientific. Since all of us have been conditioned to associate science wit hits enormous success in computer, telecommunication, space exploration and other sound technologies this term continues to impress and instill hope in medicine even while it continues to fail to contain the epidemics of chronic diseases. This cover of ‘science’ and reliance on big name medical specialists must be the reason why our political leaders instead of holding special hearings to investigate this gigantic catastrophe and imposter of science keep supplying NIH with more billions of dollars for ‘more research’ which essentially gets dumped in a bonfire. By a comparison, even very rare mistakes in technologies, such as in the auto, or aviation industry trigger urgent congressional hearings. There, no one suggests more research to correct failures, but only to investigate the exact reasons for these. Why has the same not been carried out in medicine where human casualties exceed accidents in the technological sector by the millions?! Not only this complete lack of control over the disastrous quality of modern medicine costs millions of people poor quality of life due to suffering, side effects of drugs, and lives, too, but in addition, their hard earned money are thrown in the fire, in the name of science.

Obviously, the difference between successful science in technologies and failed science in medicine must lie in their respective rankings. Technological success is owed to high quality of precision and reliability in its based exact sciences such as physics, mathematics and chemistry, as these created a healthy bridge between basic research and applied science, that minimizes mistakes and maximizes success. In medicine this bridge does not even exist, instead is an abyss between the two that filled with speculations. An example of the real practical value of minimizing mistakes and quickly exposing empty speculations through exactness of math and reliable theories in physics, is evidenced in the 2nd law of thermodynamics in physics, where a single math formula deems impossible to engineer an everlasting machine, based on its own energy source. This saves from waste of time and funds on such senseless undertaking, even though research in the process would produce many formally legitimate scientific findings, as medicine has. Unfortunately, scientists admitted that math formulas cannot be applied to the human body because it is too complex or nonlinear. Without such, reliable theories and healthy bridge 99% of all treatments and research ended up engineering the equivalent of impossible everlasting machines, in medicine. However, even in exact sciences, nothing is given and “exact recipes for engineering do not exist as intelligent guess is always necessary” stated an expert in decision science, MIT physics professor, George E. Pugh, PhD. In the absence of healthy bridge for engineering, inexact sciences like psychology, social science, and medicine, are at the mercy of speculations or blind guesswork of choosing from millions of things to bundle something together, the best they can. Since random speculations have never belonged to high grade science, knowledgeable scientists such as Israeli-born, Cambridge University physics professor, David Deutsch, PhD referred to medicine as operating on rule of thumb and Soviet physicist Nobel laureate, Professor David Landau, PhD, called certain inexact sciences as senseless. Other physicists, as the two professors, in their book, Fashionable Nonsense, have exposed this generic Achilles heel in inexact sciences to fall for speculations. As an example, they intentionally fabricated a nonsense theory based on some formally scientific references that was published as a legitimate theory by a peer reviewed scientific journal. Fashionable nonsense flourishes in alternative-integrative medicine and because its speculative approaches keep failing they keep changing their fashions. Depending which one of these has a bigger mouth or pocket to market itself, that one becomes the next fashionable nonsense. Currently, the division of pharmaceutical fashionable nonsense, in alternative-integrative medicine, is headed by so called functional medicine, in energy medicine a fad, NAET. (A brief analysis of NAET as being harmful medical nonsense is presented in the video recording of the FCT seminar: The Extremely Complex Hidden Nature of Chronic Diseases and Proper Bio-Resonance Testing, as the only Key to Unlock These). These and thousand other fashionable nonsenses are easily implantable in this industry as it well exploits gullibility and absence of criteria of proper scientific scrutiny, among its practitioners. I know this first hand, as I used to fall for these speculations, myself, in the past too until I suspected a big rat in this field and started learning principles of real science. Moreover, besides all inexact sciences being vulnerable to speculations, even with the purest of motives, the reality is that, most of the time, these are motivated by pursuits of market control, prestige and profits.

As philosophers of science stated centuries ago, scientific knowledge poorly constructed resembles an impressive looking building without foundation, that is built to collapse, as these have been in medicine. Just recently American Journal of Medicine declared the collapse of even the very gold standard of medical practice – evidence-based medicine – that was based on thousands of positive studies, supposedly scientifically supporting its practice. Yet, its end result, in the actual medical practice, has rather been an outright evidence of failure. (AJM, Vol. 130, No. 11, Nov 2017). The problem with the ‘evidence’ is that these studies, as many in alternative medicine, were based on the flawed or artificial animal and human models of disease. These flaws consisted of mechanistic attachments of treatments, drugs, against some chosen abnormal findings in lab, or other tests which are commonly found under generic disease names or labels. These attachments along with the subsequent bookkeeping activity, statistics, made this process formally ‘scientific’, where bookkeeping established some formal superiority of drugs over placebos where the latter, logistically, are nothing or piece of dirt. As this ‘evidence’ over nothing has failed to produce what really counts—reversals of diseases—but only some temporary improvement in abnormal findings, it has ignored far deeper and more important sources of these findings and nature of disease. These are their very causes along with the individual state of each disease for each patient. The individual disease for each patient consists of genetic predisposition, different combinations of causes, individual sensitivity to these, a number and exact identity of all malfunctioned organs, besides just those detected by limited lab and other tests, as well as the differences in lifestyle and environment, from person to person. The end result, apples — drugs — which were used to establish some bookkeeping ‘evidence’ in the studies, ended up treating oranges, essentially different diseases in the real life.

No wonder “magnificent buildings” keep collapsing and the hundreds of billions of dollars, combined, spent by NIH and other parties, over the years, on medical research have largely produced only piles of papers of unknown value with NIH seeking some other sciences to explain this global failure. This statement by Columbia University Professor Stuart Firestein, PhD, speaks exactly of a real scientific value of these papers that no one really knows what to do with, due to an absence of a healthy bridge to intelligently connect any of these. “Even papers in immunology or cell biology mystify me — and so do some papers in my own field, neurobiology. Every day my expertise seems to get narrower. So scientists have had to fall back on another strategy for coping with the mountain of information: we largely ignore it… But if scientists would talk about the questions rather than boring your eyes out of their sockets with reams of jargon, and if the media reported not only on new discoveries but the questions they answered and the new puzzles they created, and if educators stopped trafficking in facts that are already available on Wikipedia—then we might find a public once again engaged in this great adventure, science, that has been going on for the past 15 generations.” (Scientific American, April 2012).

Speaking of the media, if it had ever bothered following through on all of its initially reported hyped ‘promising’ medical discoveries, it would have also reported that virtually none of these has gotten beyond this point.

Likewise, ‘promising’ basic cancer research, among other specialties, that has costed taxpayers mega billions defines its real worth too. “The terabytes of data produced by cancer research could be too much of a good thing until we figure out better ways to manage the information.” (Nature, Vol. 509, May 29, 2014). Alternative-integrative medicine is just as unable to manage its own information and apples to treat oranges.

3. A scientific impossibility for medical speculations to succeed under the current paradigms

“The problem lies not in the intentions, nor in the dedication of individuals, but as so often in the history of science, from a limitation in the prevailing paradigm or model that governs and limits thinking in any given era.”
Thomas Kuhn, PhD (Physics), Professor, Philosophy of Science*, author: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, recognized as one of the most significant books in science of the 20th century.

*One of the main goals of philosophy of science is to protect science from scientists.

“Governs and limits thinking” stresses that if a paradigm or model that serves the role of computer software to solve a certain problem was not programed with the necessary important knowledge to accomplish this it can’t be squeezed out of it.

To realize the real odds for speculations to succeed under the current limited conventional and alternative paradigms, Thomas Edison, when engineering a simple working light bulb, faced 125 million wrong combinations in choosing just 5 correct materials out of only 100 (basic research). What are the odds of choosing the right combination in what and how to treat chronic diseases when the pieces to choose from are in the hundreds of thousands, combined? These pieces are: internal organs and tissues (hundreds), abnormal test findings (thousands), potential causative agents, such as environmental pollutants (hundred thousands), infectious agents (hundreds, most common), noxious dietary and substance abuse agents (dozens), side effects of medical products and treatments (thousands), treatment options such as drugs, nutritional supplements, herbs, chelators, ‘detoxifiers’, oxygenative ‘binders’, homeopathics, acupuncture and other energetic interventions, including electrocutions and something ‘quantum,’ (thousands). Such a number can’t be fathomed and just settling for something astronomical, beyond trillions, is sufficient to realize an impossibility for speculations to succeed without exact measurements or diagnostic tools and reliable scientific theory which can establish a correct treatment. Without these, such an endless number of options only invites endless speculations and activities, particularly in alternative-integrative medicine where the criteria for proper scrutiny either for their inventors or practitioners do not exist.The similar mathematical impossibility to arrive to anything concrete with the prevailing diagnostic methods when the odds are astronomical was reached by the aforementioned Harvard autism researcher, Dr. Herbert when she calculated that to screen only three thousand out of 100 thousand chemicals in our daily environment for all possible neurotoxic combinations would require 85 billion lab tests.

To realize the futility of conquering chronic diseases without properly diagnosing and removing their causes one is to view causes as virtual bullets lodged in the different organs through which they have initiated and continue to advance disease. Obviously, for as long as bullets remain unextracted by treatments, disease and more diseases, in the future, have the only course — to advance. This has been exactly the case because conventional and alternative lab methods are incapable of diagnosing causes of chronic diseases, toxicological agents or environmental pollutants where it counts the most—inside the internal organs. The same methods often miss chronic infections such as Lyme and co-infections, herpes, Epstein Barr and other viruses, parasitic, fungal and other infections which always play a significant role in all chronic diseases. These severe diagnostic limitations doom both medicines on pulling at straws, facing trillions of options with anything having something to do with disease or ‘better’ health. Since there are so many factors that appear having something to do with disease and its tests and treatments, this made it impossible for even a medically illiterate person to offer something which would not make some sense, in the alternative market. As the result, anything goes.

Both medicines are dead-ended but the show must go on.

John Ioannidis, MD, Professor of Medicine and Director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center at Stanford University School of Medicine. (An Epidemic of False Claims. Scientific American. June 1, 2001.)

“The problem begins with the public’s rising expectations of science. Being human scientists are tempted to show that they know more than they do. Emphasis is often given to single studies instead of the big picture… The ability to prove something false continues to be a hallmark of science. But scientists need to improve the way they do their research and how they disseminate evidence… Eventually findings that bear on treatment decisions and policies should come with a disclosure of any uncertainty that surrounds them. It is fully acceptable for patients and physicians to follow a treatment based on information that has, say, only a 1 percent chance of being correct. But we must be realistic about the odds.”

Certainly, “to follow a treatment based on information… only a 1 percent chance of being correct” does not speak very highly for such treatments. In conventional medicine, such disclosures are made rarely, in alternative-integrative industry never which, quoting Charles Darwin remarking on certain scientists, keeps “preaching ignorance with confident face.”

A recent book, Snowball in a Blizzard, A Physician’s Notes on Uncertainty in Medicine, authored by a medical school faculty member, delivers the same point of the poor quality of conventional and alternative medicines, due to their practitioners practicing blindly. (Steven Hatch, MD, Basic Books, 2016).

While, to its credit, conventional medicine tends to follow certain rules of science by, at least, acknowledging failures and attempting to minimize speculations, the alternative-integrative medical industry, short of medical school faculty members and peer-reviewed journals, follows no rules. Making irresponsible claims, referring to some low meaning or outright mickey-mouse research and, even lying in order to retail senseless products, treatments and services is the leading strategy. Its only credit is that it considers more possible causes of chronic diseases than conventional medicine does, with some of these being important. Yet, it can neither differentiate their relative importance nor properly diagnose and treat them. Even when, among these causes, it attempts to treat usually ignored by conventional doctors, mercury toxicity, parasitic, fungal, or overlooked Lyme infections it falls in the same trap, as pharmaceutical drugs, with only different apples treating oranges, since there is only individual for each patient mercury toxicity, chronic infection and thousand other problems. That is why this industry keeps failing too and feeding its practitioners and patients with more medical tricks under its long sleeve. To the credit of the highest office of the US healthcare system, the National Institutes of Health it, following a century of failed attempts and wasted hundreds of billions of the tax payers’ dollars on ‘more research’, finally realized that the fundamental reason for failure is the missing bridge between basic research and applied science. In an attempt to solve this it advanced a Translational Research or Road Map Initiative in 2005, that seeks to finally translate millions of accrued findings of basic medical research into, productive medical practice to prevent and reverse chronic diseases. Yet, they also realized that the task is so daunting that they hope that some other sciences would come to rescue. But the sinister conundrum is that due to the aforementioned lack of proper education in physics and other important sciences, they don’t know which sciences. Besides, the sound goal of finding that translational bridge faces another conundrum with the current medical paradigm because the only way to arrive at successful translational research is by establishing, first, the primary nature and targets of chronic diseases to treat. However, this can only be established through a different paradigm, based on controlled energy medicine with capable Bio-resonance testing and causative homeopathy evolved by FCT. Only through consistent reversals of chronic diseases, as demonstrated by FCT one can be highly certain about both main causes and nature of chronic diseases. No matter what research discovers but without achieving actual solution—reversal of diseases—that establishes a sound model or nature of disease, along with capable diagnostic and therapeutic methods which have achieved success, one cannot determine the real importance of research findings. Short of this, research just keeps pulling at straws and throwing most of the grants in a fire. Due to the aforementioned conundrum, at the time of creation of this page, or 13 years after, the NIH initiative has made zero progress.

The highest medical body of alternative-integrative medicine, the Office of Alternative and Integrative Medicine under NIH, has admitted to its own failure too, as stated by its Director, Josephine Briggs, MD, PhD, concerning the lack of evidence of efficacy of these treatments in chronic diseases (Boston Globe, November 2014). It does not know how to overcome this, either.

But there is another large industry which must be mentioned and warned of, as it also misleads its supporters and contributes to this waste of resources and hopes, due to the lack of a healthy bridge. This industry consists of countless disease foundations supported by desperate patients, good-hearted people and well-meant philanthropies.

Do disease foundations* educate or exploit their followers?

*Disease foundations are different from benevolent philanthropies such as Linda and Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffet and others, alike.

I, and as many people still do, used to support in the past certain disease foundations, especially on cancer and children related research, because of the publicized noble goals to find cures through sponsoring more research. Disease foundations inspire their followers to donate by promising educational services regarding ‘best’ treatments, ‘promising’ research and impressing with their advisory boards full of big name scientists. However, the more I learned about the muddy waters and the business side of medicine and its research industry with their virtual obsession to find cures only through costly drugs, the more it was becoming clear that such cures, short of rare exceptions, are impossible. Furthermore, books: On the Take, Overdosed America, How We Do Harm, published by respectable conventional academicians, and other media made it abundantly clear that ‘education’ of patients through disease foundations, and of practitioners through professional associations and academies, from pediatrics to geriatrics, served more the interests of these organizations and their business liaisons than real education. At the core of this mass deceit lies the same, very low grade of medicine as science that just exploits hopes with no sound theory in place to discern this. How could possibly ‘best’ treatments, ‘promising’ research and big name scientists on the advisory boards make much of a difference when all of these have already failed to cure, virtually, a single ‘chronic’ disease, in real life? Another common trap for many people is in having higher hopes for those disease foundations which were established by patients or their family members and, particularly, if these are also open to ‘innovative’ approaches of alternative-integrative medicine to find cures. However, as stated by Professor Kuhn, science has never found dedication of individuals, foundation founders in this case, to be sufficient to overcome limitations of prevailing paradigms or simply speaking scientific solutions cannot be bought by just raising and spending money, by foundations or anyone else. The fact remains that all of the researchers whom foundations sponsor have been trained in mechanistic chemical pharmaceutical research in “dead matter” that can only produce to sell more of the aforementioned apples, drugs, to treat oranges. Further on this page, an exposure of a common deceit of innovative treatments in medicine by a Nobel Laureate in medicine. This is particularly the case in alternative-integrative medicine that plays by no rules. A concrete example, a new patient and another victim of these ‘innovative’ treatments for Lyme disease, in this case, shared the following. Apparently the ‘Lyme literate specialist’ Richard Horowitz MD, whose first book, “Solving the Mystery of Lyme and Chronic Disease” I criticized on Amazon for promoting incapable and harmful treatments, apparently wrote a ‘revelation part two’, another hyped book on the subject. According to this patient, his case was used as one of the ‘success’ cases, in both books. However, the truth is this patient questioned directly the doctor as to when he will, finally, experience success of this treatment. He never did and his real story is one of a real horror, than success. Besides him being very sick, to begin with, these treatments added to the damage where he is unable to control his 24/7 pain with opioids and remains an invalid. Another former patient of the ‘specialist’, who I saw recently in my office and whose ‘success’ story was not mentioned in the book, shared that following his special Lyme treatment with a slew of antibiotics, she turned yellow, collapsed and had to discontinue this torture. I have met in my office many similar victims of ‘innovative’ treatments of ‘Lyme specialists’ in some ‘progressive’ clinic in Florida, New York and all over the country. However, deceit of these books and clinics may not be even intentional, but even worse due to a blatant ignorance in medicine and science of these and other ‘innovators’ as they, likely, don’t even know a definition of cure or solution. Many of these ‘Lyme, autism’ and other ‘clinics’ and ‘centers’ proclaim cure when a patient felt better only for a few days, while still propped up by a slew of drugs and ‘natural’ pills. A former CEO of one of the Fortune 500 companies, who knows a few things about deceitful marketing, shared with me that he was surprised when a ‘progressive clinic’ was filming testimonials of ‘cured’ Lyme patients who were still hooked to intravenous bags with drugs.

An autism foundation, established by the parents of autistic child, promotes treatments which are administered by DAN (or whatever their name is, today) ‘specialists’, following which I have seen a number of children becoming severely damaged. Both email and certified return receipt letter to the training facility — Autism Research Institute — offering them my explanations for these damages and far more effective, much less costly FCT approach, remained ignored.

All in all, disease foundations, including those which promote ‘innovative’ treatments, have become a part of this bottomless money pit of wasted donations which are spent on their payrolls and senseless research. Even a gigantic 1.3 billion dollar sum couldn’t buy better research and went to waste by the European Union, lately. This humble statement of the lead scientist, world-renowned Israeli brain researcher, Professor Henry Markram, MD, of this just recently failed project, delivers the same message: “…although researchers worldwide are publishing tens of thousands of neuroscience studies every year, neither our understanding of basic brain functions nor our ability to treat brain disorders seemed to be progressing much.” (Trouble in Mind: Two Years In, a $1-billion-plus effort to simulate the human brain is in disarray. Was it poor management, or is something fundamentally wrong with Big Science? Scientific American, October 2015). Scientific American is a science savvy publication which correctly goes to the core of the problem, the fundamentals or the very DNA of our medical science, it is, point blank, poor and primitive. Look at the foundation Autism Speaks, established by the family of an autistic child. Where would they and other foundations get better researchers from? After collecting and wasting hundreds of millions of dollars, over the years, conducting impressive PR campaigns and milking good-hearted NBA players and corporations, the foundation has accomplished nothing. Am I the only ‘cynic’? Read this: “Since 2005, Autism Speaks has raised and spent more than half a billion dollars, and they have nothing to show for it. We still don’t know what causes autism, we have no treatments, we have no cure, and we still don’t even know how many people have it, nor do we have any accepted biological markers. Children today are just as likely to develop autism as they were $500,000 million dollars ago. They’ve saved no one”. (http://www.ageofautism.com/2016/07/dr-rob-ring-and-what-went-wrong-at-autism-speaks-everything.html).

A medical school faculty member and former editor of the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA), Lester S. King MD, pointed too that philanthropies, as disease foundations, can’t accomplish anything either by sponsoring incapable medicine. (Medical Thinking, Princeton University Press, 1982). When I tried to share my successful yet simple non-pharmaceutical FCT approach with one of the famous brain researchers, on Autism Speaks’ advisory board, whose son remained autistic, I never heard from him. The problem isn’t just with this foundation, but all of them because they have no place to go but hiring researchers all of whom have failed to solve chronic diseases in their corresponding specialties. Because they were trained to research apples to treat oranges. After realizing this I stated, years ago, in one of my articles on Lyme disease, that millions of dollars donated with much fanfare by some Connecticut Lyme Foundation to a famous Lyme researcher at a prestigious university center in NYC, was a waste. Also, from my long successful experience in determining and treating the real underlying causes of chronic Lyme disease, I knew that the Lyme bacteria was not a primary cause of the disease, but only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The following years have confirmed that millions have been wasted and research has produced nothing. This email testifies where Lyme disease is really at, these days:

—–Original Message—–
From: Elaine…@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 12:05 AM
To: info@yurkovsky.com
Subject: FCT Field Control Therapy Contact: Mold exposure &Lyme

Message:
I was wondering if you could help me. I’ve been sick (for) 30 yrs. have gone everywhere spending thousands of dollars. I heard you were very good.

For decades, based on Bio-resonance testing and the principle, “body can’t lie”, FCT warned of the significant harm of antibiotics and compared their use in chronic infections to an illusion of getting ahead by paying a mortgage with negative amortization, where the actual debt keeps rising. Finally, a number of accomplished infectious disease specialists have issued the same warning. In his recent book, Missing Microbes How The Overuse of Antibiotics is Fueling Our Modern Plagues, NYU professor and former president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Martin J. Blaser, MD presented dozens of detrimental effects of antibiotics, including cancer and death. How can these ‘innovative progressive Lyme specialists’ produce cures while poisoning their patients with gigantic doses of such harmful substances over lengthy periods of time?! What it really produces is permanent harm, including mutated antibiotic resistant and more aggressive Lyme and other infections, unless undone by FCT. Even in the rare responders, a few lucky, genetically robust patients, the next tick bite starts the cycle over, as these treatments do not render any better, and if anything, only a lower resistance to infections. I recommend you read Dr. Blaser’s book.

My proposal to the aforementioned famous researcher about a far more effective, less costly and antibiotic-free FCT approach to Lyme disease, based on physics of Bio-resonance testing and novel homeopathic method, fell on deaf ears, as usual. Besides the fact that physics to pharmaceutically programmed minds remains as confounding as the difference between a string theory and violins, the real tragedy of our medicine and all of its victims is that there is no money in homeopathy or energized water. Underneath of all this impressive phraseology, ‘research’ and ‘search for cure’ in reality there is only search for new patented drugs to generate more profits, where the researchers and their universities seek their share of. Who needs cures from some energized water?! Wake up, medicine is just another market place. As Columbia University scientist, Martin Blank PhD stated true, dedicated scientists are endangered species, our days, because if their work threatens big money behind a mainstream science their research work will be placed in a choke mode, by cutting off research grants. No less than the former president of Harvard University, Professor Derek Bok, PhD, in his book, Universities in the Market Place, among other sources, noted that researchers and their research centers, particularly in medicine, want solutions which can generate high revenues for them. And for this one cannot find a better partner than a Daddy with deep pockets, the one who has corrupted and destroyed the quality of medical education – the pharmaceutical industry. It has invaded just about all of the major professional associations and academies as well as disease foundations. Foundations and the majority of professional associations who are open to alternative-integrative medicine have their own Daddies, too – vendors and sponsors − who market through them senseless tests, pills, supplements, machinery, you name it, using their conventions and media. One look at these vendors and sponsors makes it obvious to a reasonably educated eye that this is no longer science or medicine, but Mark Twain’s: “First came the miners, then came the whores”. Concerning my aforementioned critique on Amazon in April of 2015 of the book “Solving the Mystery of Lyme and Chronic Disease”, and statement that such treatments can ‘succeed’ in only making this disease worse. The author did not contest my critique, he couldn’t, and just to show you how biased I really am, a month later at Lyme Connection Foundation meeting that marched him in as Lyme’s messiah, he admitted this, himself. As expected the lobby area at the meeting was covered with ‘whores,’ vendors preying on the desperate by peddling you name it ‘cures for Lyme’. My written question to the messiah asking him to respond to my critique of his method was silenced with smiles by the foundation’s president and messiah, raising a question, who exactly is the president and this foundation serving? But, suddenly, my bad image of a party spoiler was rescued by one of the victims of these ‘special treatments’, promoted by this and other Lyme foundations. This patient asked the right question: “Can your approach cure Lyme disease?” To this the messiah issued the honest answer, “No”. Needless to say, this foundation had rejected my proposal to present FCT’s simple, energetic approach which cures Lyme without toxic antibiotics, ‘natural’ pills and electrocutions. Usually, FCT proposals get rejected partly because of the priorities of whoring business that many organizations have with the vendors, whom FCT threatens, and partly because the management of the majority of foundations is incompetent in both science and medicine. Occasionally, with an exception to this rule as when Massachusetts Lyme foundation did give me an opportunity to present my approach at their September 2017 meeting, even if in only a small, not the main auditorium, the finale restored the truth. Even as my presentation was supported by a live testimonial of a cured patient of mine who had not responded to antibiotics and other kitchen sinks of Lyme ‘literate’ doctors’, yet, following my presentation, I was immediately removed from the speakers question-answer session to be held at the main auditorium. Obviously, my pill-free approach must have threatened both the small army of their vendors and ‘Lyme specialists’ present there.

If one picture is worth a thousand words, these illustrations offer a comparison between the number of tests and treatments offered by ‘Lyme literate specialists’, with the related sponsoring and vendoring activities, on one hand, and FCT on the other.

All these tests and treatments are the classic of shooting in the dark, where the last one understands the nature of disease the more inventory one needs to attempt to overcome the impossible, to defeat it.

The difference between the pharmaceutical warehouses of ‘Lyme specialists’ and FCT can be gathered from a testimonial of a patient who remained an invalid following the former and was cured by FCT. You may view it on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utdJxElmIwc.

My several communications to another Lyme ‘educational’ foundation, The Lyme Times, questioning them on why they allow these ‘literate’ Lyme charlatans and pill companies to prey on their members – patients − were left without a response.

Another example of medical ignorance and exploitation by disease foundations is a foundation established by the mother of an autistic boy, based on an ignorant speculation that autism is caused by congenital Lyme disease! With zero proof of this or cured children, the foundation has procured business for itself through public presentations filled with vendors and alternative-integrative charlatans who, in their turn, generate business by poisoning these poor children with unnecessary toxic antibiotics, chelation and vitamins. One can gather the real benefits of such ‘education’ and ‘treatments for congenital Lyme disease’ and how children, in general, are being also a part of this global medical blood bath, through this email:

From: …… [mailto:contact@…….com]
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 12:13 PM
To:info@yurkovsky.com
Subject: Please send a referral for our young son, we live in the greater Los Angeles area
Hello,
We need help! We have been trying to help our son who is 10 for 10 years to heal with his many challenges, including congenital Lyme. We have been to dozens upon dozens of practitioners and he is still unimproved.
Can you refer to a practitioner trained in your technique near our home please. We live in Pasadena California.
Thank you kindly

The bottom line, crippled paradigms cannot buy solutions no matter who and how much pays, where a majority of disease foundations have become just another, to quote Warren Buffet referencing the pharmaceutical industry, “tapeworm on the body of our healthcare”. The fundamental problem and very source of tapeworm is not so much the cost of its drugs, but that the chemical mechanistic paradigm has forced our and the world’s healthcare into their necessity as well as other unproductive costly medical services. This can be overcome only through education of physicians in the different, far more effective and less costly medicine, that is based on relevant interdisciplinary sciences, which are still sought by NIH. This is a mammoth work that will require both extensive resources and man power. I have established a Foundation of Integrative Sciences in Medicine Inc., to accomplish this goal. If you wish or know others who can help and get involved, its website: www.foisim.org. Note: vendors need not to contact.

4. The enormous profits which reward the medical industries for failures.

“We know more and more about less and less and
science has become our enemy, instead of a friend.”
Two-time nominee for the Nobel prize in Medicine,
Professor Robert Becker, MD.

As if failures weren’t enough of a curse in the first place, yet these, in addition, become rewarded. The conventional medical industry generates trillions of dollars annually for its activities and the alternative-integrative some 100 billion. The revenues rise through more exponentially: ‘better’ drugs and new costly services and research, in conventional industry. In alternative-integrative industry through ‘natural’ products, gadgets, services, ‘educational’ events, some programs, fellowships, or just ‘how to’ pep talks. The main milk cow for both industries is the retail approach to healthcare where treatments are not tailored to each individual patient’s disease but attached to a generic disease label: ‘allergy’, fibromyalgia, ‘autism’, ‘Lyme’, arthritis, ‘heart disease’, ‘tumor’, hypertension, and so on. This accomplishes the retailers’ dream, to treat people as uniform herds with the ‘same’ disease, but not people themselves with their actual individual diseases. Back to apples and oranges, where the ‘blizzard’ makes it easy to sell snow to Eskimos, by anyone. Here, some formal scientific references to anything: cholesterol, inflammation, bad gene methylation, antioxidants, mercury, mycotoxins, parasites, brain neurotransmitters with the list being endless, move merchandise ‘scientifically’ by selling drugs and natural fads, from conventional medical study established that the only difference between the ‘new better’ drugs on one hand, and old ones on the other, was higher price for the former but none in the quality of care. In alternative medicine, no one even bothers to find out anything concerning the real worth of treatments, anything goes. The industry fools its practitioners and the public with hype akin to ‘sailors do it better’, selling them piles of ‘natural’ goods, thank God no one really knows how to scrutinize these claims. These piles make the alternative-integrative industry far more deceptive than conventional, because such a great number of hyped treatments, tests and products, without rigorous scientific standards and exact measuring tools (e.g., the impossibility of knowing if disease, A, is being actually reversed by a product or a treatment, B, inside the body) keep instilling hopes of “what if it works?” However hope is not a scientific entity, scrutiny is, but which does not exist for this industry. While the industry and its entrepreneurial doctors retail their esoteric stockpiles of tests, treatments, and products as something ‘progressive’, ‘innovative’ and powerful, their actual origin is just the opposite − weakness, ineptitude and redressed failure − because if something really worked, as FCT does with only one approach, why would one need so many tests and treatments? Just look at what one cruise missile can do these days that thousands of bombers couldn’t in the past.

Nobel laureate in medicine, Professor Joshua Lederberg, PhD

Nobel laureate in medicine, Professor Joshua Lederberg, PhD, has offered a realistic view concerning the true worth of innovations in medicine: “the true value of innovations lies in their utilization” or actual benefit to their consumers, people; otherwise, it is just a marketing hype. (Innovations vs Hype, Scientific American, Custom Media, Jan. 2014). These quotes of the medical practitioners themselves express, better than I, the real value of medical ‘innovations’ and ‘progress’, which only progress lie in progression of profits and costs. On the conventional side: “Who among us has not repeatedly seen claims of fourth-generation drugs with no side-effects, new operations that yield glowing results with minimal complications, or the latest infallible, high-tech diagnostic procedure only to discover months or years later that these claims missed the truth by miles?” (“A Piece of My Mind,” Journal of the American Medical Association, February 27, 1991). On the alternative side: “I have been in practice for 15 years now and have assembled quite a lot of technology. I started with classical homeopathy but realized its limitations. Along the way, I have been through VEGA, Kirlian, EAV, IV’s including chelation, DMPS, hydrogen peroxide, hydrochloric acid and the usual vitamin-mineral protocols. Also, neural therapy, dark field microscopy, biological terrain assessment and complex homeopathy. I can see an upgrade on the horizon, but, I am tired of running after all these things. I feel that my concept of ‘underlying causes’ needs to make a shift into a different level.” (AH ND.) You may add to these the rest of alternative-integrative tests and treatments. Yet, if you search any of these on the internet, you will be impressed by their marketing hype, quoting a disenchanted integrative MD, “as the best thing since sliced bread.”

In light of the unsubstantiated claims of the alternative-integrative industry, one has to agree with the former editors of the New England Journal of Medicine that alternative medicine is to stop having a free ride with its claims but be subjected to the same scrutiny as conventional medicine. (Alternative Medicine – The Risks of Untested and Unregulated Remedies, NEJM, Sept. 1998, Vol. 339, #12). So, the next time you see an ‘integrative’ or ‘holistic’ center or doctor proudly offering so many esoteric tests and treatments, keep in mind their real origin. On the whole, the real victims of all of this are patients who are misled into thinking that these and other ‘innovations’ in this industry represent something progressive, and that the practitioners who use these are on some cutting edge.

5. The industries block superior medical approaches for the fear of losing market control.

In the aforementioned book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Professor Kuhn emphasized that all decisions in science and its practice are dictated and constrained by the chosen paradigms or general approaches of scientists. A paradigm can be likened to problem-solving computer software where no scientist, or health practitioner is able to squeeze something out of the software that it was not programmed for. The more the software is familiar with the basic principles of solving problems, by using relevant sciences and medical approaches, the more capable is the paradigm to cure, substantially reverse, or halt disease, depending on its stage. While scientists generally knew about capable and incapable paradigms, what actually made this book so famous was the revelation that scientists much favor scientific revolutions which do not threaten them personally, through demotion of their paradigms. Obviously, the reasons are not scientific but selfish because through paradigms they sustain their self-worth, authority, control, research grants and income. As the consequence, if more progressive but unfamiliar to their training and skills paradigms emerge, they usually ignore or block these, and continue indoctrinating their students and followers with an inferior one. Since a complex nature of any challenging problem has thousands of facts to choose from, they would continue emphasizing only the positives about those ones which sustain their paradigm, while ignoring and silencing their flaws, and conflicts with other important knowledge. Such scientists, whom Einstein deemed utilitarians and prevailing, Professor Kuhn named “normal scientists,” because they are both common and not true scientists. Medicine, which has become a trillion dollar apple pie, fosters “normal scientists” more than any other science, because if in a technology market the price to pay for products of outdated paradigms is going out of business, in conventional and alternative medicines these are rewarded through even more business, since failures dictate more ‘new’ treatments and research. A few examples. The several large studies demonstrated evidence of harm of vitamins to humans as they developed higher rates of heart disease, cancer and, even, mortality than nonconsumers. Yet we have never heard of alternative practitioners, vitamin companies and ‘health educators’ ceasing to distribute and promote these products or mentioning these studies. If anything, ‘better vitamins’ keep flooding the market. Likewise, several large studies in conventional medicine have demonstrated lack of benefit but only harm from prolonged antibiotic treatments in chronic Lyme disease. However, ‘Lyme literate’ and other ‘integrative Lyme specialists’ still administer these poisons to these patients where increasing the courses and number of antibiotics have only increased their side effects.

One of many examples, I have recently seen a girl who following eight months of intravenous antibiotics for Lyme disease, still had Lyme disease plus severe gastrointestinal side effects.

Homeopathy, for centuries, has been producing dramatic conflicting observations in relation to chemical-pharmaceutical paradigm, both conventional and ‘natural’. How many “normal scientists” in conventional medicine have bothered to analyze these observations pointing to the deeper workings of the human body and an entirely new medical paradigm? The great majority of them, including those who control medical journals, still ignore and block the important observations and knowledge from medical doctors whom they, allegedly, ‘educate’.

The concrete case, here, involves several conventional medical peer-reviewed journals refusing to publish an astonishing study demonstrating the spectacular success of a homeopathic vaccine (homeoprophylaxis) against the deadly infection of leptospirosis, on as many as 2.4 million people in Cuba! The homeopathic leptospirosis vaccine was 10 times cheaper than conventional vaccine and, even, demonstrated a slight superior reduction in mortality and morbidity rates, over conventional one. Obviously, the main reason for the study was that ‘primitive’ Cuban government and scientists, unlike their ‘advanced’ American counterparts, did not have billions of dollars to feed the bonfire. The study was conducted by the Cuban equivalent of our NIH, involving conventional medical specialists in infectious diseases, immunology and other specialties. Below is the correspondence between Gustavo Bracho, MD, the lead author of that study, and myself.

Dr. Savely Yurkovsky, MD
Enviado el: miercoles, 22 de diciembre de 2010 20:28
Para: gbracho@finlay.edu.cu
Asunto: Leptospirosis Study
Dear Dr.Bracho –
Congratulations on your homeoprophylaxis with Leptospirosis study. It has a great significance for medicine. I am writing a chapter on homeopathy for the Textbook of Integrative Gastroenterology where I am including the reference to your study. My question to you is: Due to the significance of this study, did you try to publish it in mainstream medical peer-reviewed journals and, if yes, was it rejected for publication?
Thank you in advance for the courtesy of your reply.
With happy holidays,
Savely Yurkovsky, MD

From: Gustavo Bracho [gbracho@finlay.edu.cu]
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2010 6:40 AM
To: Savely Yurkovsky, MD
Subject: RE: Leptospirosis study
Dear Dr. Savely Yurkovsky,
Thank you very much for your message. The answer to your questions is yes. We tried to publish in 3 mainstream peer-review journals on the field of epidemiology, medicine and prevention. All of them rejected the article arguing singular reasons. None of the reasons were based on scientific criticisms. I can mention: “not appropriated for the audience of the journal”, “the scope suitable for higher rate journal” and a request to send the informed consent of all the 2.4 million persons involved in the intervention resulting in “lacking of appropriated evidence of meeting the ethic issues from the Helsinki declaration for clinical trials”. After a year and half trying to get it published we decided to submit the manuscript to Homeopathy journal who finally published the article in June this year. (Homeopathy (2010) 99, 156-166). I hope this answers your question.
Please do not hesitate to contact me for any further information.
Happy Christmas,
Dr. Gustavo Bracho
Finlay Institute
Havana City, CUBA

The refusal to publish this study, which was unique in its human enrollment size and scientific significance, just due to the lack of signed consents is as ‘logical’ as to accuse a doctor of saving someone’s life through a superior CPR method, for not obtaining a prior signed consent from the dying person. The ‘normal scientists’ of those journals, who rejected this publication concealed the great value of such simple, inexpensive and effective energetic approach to health care, have obviously done this for purely selfish reasons. Because this approach:

1. is foreign to their field of professional expertise and skills
2. would threaten their level of importance and personal control through downgrading these
3. threatens the medical and scientific monopoly of their chemical-pharmaceutical paradigm because it presents it with a real scientific blow, known as a conflict, where humans respond so well to programmed signals in ordinary inexpensive water.

Similarly, just a few years before this groundbreaking Cuban study my presentation of the same method at the annual Bio-terrorism 2005 conference: “Unified Science & Technology for Reducing Biological Threats & Countering Terrorism”, with affiliation to the Homeland Security Office, hit the same wall. This was in spite of my presenting many scientific references in support, as listed in my book, Biological, Chemical and Nuclear Warfare… The Power of Digital Medicine, for the use in acute emergencies, even by lay people. The conference chairman just labeled these all, as usual, “bad science,” without citing a single scientific argument why it was so “bad”. Ironically, but only two years after the Cuban scientists have initiated that successful leptospirosis study with energetically programmed water, based on ‘bad’ science!

Certainly such biased rejections continue to sustain this oxymoronic vicious cycle, whereby homeopathy remains just an ‘overdiluted unscientific water placebo’ which “we can’t accept, because there are no good published studies to validate it.” Yet when such studies or proposals for these are presented, they are rejected. A clever strategy like this can’t be beat. This bias in publication was reflected by Georgetown University Medical School Professor Wayne Jonas, MD, among other reputable scientists.

While Harvard medical school academicians have admitted that the practice of conventional medicine is based on a grossly outdated medical paradigm, inferior view of the nature and approach to disease, dating back to the 19th century (Albert-Laszlo, et al. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. January 2011, Vol 12. www.nature.com/reviews/genetics), the “normal scientists” who run our healthcare systems do their best to keep it that way.

The alternative-integrative industry, with its ‘natural’ pharmaceuticals, practices the same outdated medicine but only with different pills, and its energy medicine, treatments fare just as poorly, because of being unable to properly treat what counts the most − the main causes of chronic diseases.

Alternative-integrative industry has plenty of “normal scientists”, too. That is why when they are presented with something like FCT which, like a cruise missile, replaces the great majority of ineffective medical bombers, they block it out. Years back, upon the recommendation of the president of a major professional organization for training MDs in alternative therapies, who was familiar with my work, I submitted a proposal to its education committee to present FCT at its next meeting. Yet, it was rejected since FCT is a big threat to its training in different approaches and ‘natural’ pharmaceuticals, as well as its vendors and sponsors, all of which this organization derives revenues. My article, Chelators of Mercury, Lead, and Other Heavy Metals: Theoretical Benefits, Suboptimal Results and Real Dangers – The Implications for Autism and Other Brain- and Somatic Diseases, supported by patient cases and scientific references, confirming the ineffectiveness and harm of chelators and how FCT safely addresses this important problem, was rejected for publication by the two alternative medical peer reviewed journals. Not surprisingly, the editorial staff of these journals, integrative doctors, were running chelation−mills in their practices and mass selling ‘better’ vitamins. The editor of one of these journals was a paid consultant of a company that sells complex homeopathic remedies which I exposed as ineffective and harmful. The other examples of these ‘open-minded’ hypocrites in alternative medicine involves rejection of my presentation of FCT by several naturopathic associations at their ‘educational’ events. This was in spite of the testimonials of many naturopathic doctors who stated that FCT was the only way out of their specialty failures. Above all, my proposal was supported by a variety of documented reversals of serious chronic diseases which would have remained incurable, otherwise. Likewise, while classical (250 year-old) homeopathy is facing the brink of extinction due to its failure to produce convincing results in the treatment of chronic diseases, the management of its professional associations display far more concern about control over their members and memberships, doing business with the vendors and collecting donations than the actual quality of care of classical homeopathy. My proposals to the National Center for Homeopathy and the American Institute of Homeopathy to present documented reversals of serious chronic disease through FCT’s novel homeopathic approach, based on contemporary medical knowledge versus a dated 250 year-old one, were rejected by both. My proposals to conventional specialists to conduct clinical trials with FCT on chronic Lyme, brain concussions in athletes, and other pathologies all fell on the same dead ears. This vice of control is common to scientists whose Disney Land type of image is correctly shattered by the aforementioned British biologist, Dr. Rupert Sheldrake: “People who have faith in scientists know next to nothing about science” and that their majority resembles more of a “border police”. The statement of Professor Robert Becker, MD on this invisible subject to public eye and majority of medical practitioners is just as revealing: “I want the general public to know that science isn’t run the way they read about it in the newspapers and magazines. I want lay people to understand that they cannot automatically accept scientists’ pronouncements at face values, for too often they are self-serving and misleading”.

The end result of all of these is the dead-ended futile activities of current conventional and alternative-integrative medical practices and research, which are based on speculations of low scientific value, as reflected in this illustration:

The FCT’s solution to this impasse, that has been amply confirmed in practice, with documented reversals of chronic diseases, is based on science fundamentals which focus on the very causes of diseases and requires far less actual endless medical knowledge.

A viable medical theory that our NIH is still searching for that establishes a healthy bridge between basic research and applied science in medicine is, ultimately, the only way out of this dead-ended circle of failures, waste and deceit.

“Nothing in science — nothing in life, for that matter —
makes sense without theory.”
“Scientists love to speculate and fall in love with
their speculations, so did I.
However, scientific theories are constructed
specifically to be blown apart if proved wrong.”
Harvard biology professor, Edward O. Wilson, PhD

“No attempt to solve a scientific problem can even
be begun without the subsidy of some hypothesis.”
Nobel Laureate in medicine,
Peter Medawar, PhD