How FCT has engineered a healthy science-to-practice bridge?

How FCT has engineered a healthy science-to-practice bridge for a simple, effective and cost-contained medicine based on a science that NIH has been seeking. A little history and interesting paradoxes.

“Knowledge is knowledge and it doesn’t matter if it is conventional or alternative…”
Alternative Medicine – The risks of untested and unregulated remedies, NEJM,
Sept. 1998, vol. 339, no. 12

“Is the scientific paper fraudulent?”
On the Nature of Scientific Thought,
Nobel prize laureate in medicine,
Professor Peter Medawar, PhD

“The most revolutionary discoveries have arisen
out of observations that did not fit prevailing
scientific doctrine and required
a reexamination of the fundamental concepts.”
Nobel prize laureate in medicine,
Professor Joshua Lederberg, PhD

In the mid-1980s, after conventional specialists stated their inability to cure my very sick son, my spouse and I, as many desperate people often do, took the alternative road. Becoming as enthusiastic about these many new unusual approaches and products as their promoters were, I, besides trying these on my son, was also implementing them in my practice. But neither my son nor my really sick patients showed any progress. Besides, treatments promoted as safe and natural worsened his condition and some patients who took these treatments had the same experience. Later on, it became obvious that truly natural treatments, short of mud baths, do not exist as these all are man-made, and likewise ‘safe’ is only a hope, not an inherent property of any treatment. Further explorations of endless alternative approaches fell into the same pattern of ‘now you see it, now you don’t,’ where enthusiastic presentations at training events and through marketing opuses kept turning into failures in practice. But in the process, I became intrigued by two interesting paradoxes in both conventional and alternative medicines and decided to suspend further exploration of this bottomless medical field until I resolved these. One paradox is that between a medical professor or just a lay ‘healer’ and dozens of alternative approaches in-between, all claim addressing something ‘important’ for disease. This might be testing, treatment, diet; something metabolic, nutritional, immune, hormonal, allergic, structural, energetic, genetic, emotional and, even, astrological. Just looking at so many spirited bestsellers, in health and medicine, authored even by psychic mediums, makes one wonder how come that no one can say anything wrong? The reasons they can’t, on surface, because million things have something to do with disease and health. This alone makes all of these claims automatically look good, at least, on paper. It is not wrong to convey some relevant factors on the subject as long as their limitations are made transparent, too. In the meantime, in the absence of reversal of chronic diseases and the existence of endless factors in these, the field of inexactness can deem ‘important’ anything in the eyes of the beholder.

The following few, out of endless cases of failure, deliver the point of the real importance of the chosen factors and treatments in both medicines.

A sick young woman: “For the first four years, I went to see the best conventional medical specialists in New York City with no results. For the second four years, I have gone through the best alternative, integrative and complimentary centers in Manhattan, with no results. Then, out of desperation I turned to a shaman, because he wrote a book about his successful medical treatment. I took his treatment and felt even worse.” Note that the shaman did not treat through some spiritual rituals, but through medical diagnosis and products because these ‘made sense’ while being medically illiterate in medicine. The fact alone, that failures of supposed to be top medical professionals, doctors, opened doors to lay people: nutritionists, herbalists, homeopaths, energy movers, and others to treat something ‘important’ in disease places today’s medicine at the lowest level, as science. How many lay people would practice physics? Yet, biology and, certainly, medicine as correctly noted by Harvard biology Professor, Edward Wilson, PhD, “is unimaginably more complex than physics”. Same said by Nobel laureate in medicine, George Wald, PhD, “Even such a technological marvel, as the electronic brain, is nothing compared to even as primitive living being as an amoeba”. But the real tragedy of the dismal state of medicine goes beyond quotes and lies in the fact that it is the single most important science of all, for us, because our quality of life and its very span depend on our health. Today, in the US alone we have over 100 million people suffering from just a single disease — chronic pain. Do you want to ask them about the American dream of “pursuit of happiness”? Certainly, it is not shamans or alternative activists to be blamed for our healthcare catastrophe because they just fill in the market vacuum created by the ineptitude of the medical and osteopathic doctors due to their poor training, forcing the desperate into anyone’s hands. Statements of other patients leave little doubt about this point whose practitioners were treating something ‘important’ in disease.

“I saw 90 million doctors, mainly alternative, integrative, you name it, I am still as sick”.

—–Original Message—–
From: Elaine…@comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 1
2:05 AM
To: info@yurkovsky.com
Subject: FCT Field Control Therapy Contact: Mold exposure & Lyme

Message:
I was wondering if you could help me. I’ve been sick (for) 30 yrs. have gone everywhere spending thousands of dollars. I heard you were very good.

—–Original Message—–
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 12:13 PM
To:info@yurkovsky.com

Hello,
We need help! We have been trying to help our son who is 10 for 10 years to heal with his many challenges, including congenital Lyme. We have been to dozens upon dozens of practitioners and he is still unimproved.
Can you refer a practitioner trained in your technique near our home please. We live in Pasadena California.
Thank you kindly

What do alternative-integrative practitioners say about the real prowess of these treatments when it comes to their own health? Quoting only one of them, a recent patient: “I’ve been having some health issues that no one has really gotten to the bottom of.” “Some health issues” involved head to toe systemic debilitating problems, some for up to 20 years, with zero progress after many alternative-integrative treatments.


Photo, courtesy of Elijah Yurkovsky

Above is a recent photo of a suitcase—plus of ‘important natural products’ consumed by a woman to treat her ‘important’ health problems. These are not ‘natural treatments’ but a crude and mindless pharmaceutical rape of the body. She spent 34 years in vain, since the age of 16, searching for cures in alternative-integrative medicine after conventional medicine failed. Beside this suitcase there was also a warehouse of more treatments: intravenous nutrients and chelators, ozone, electrocutions, homeopathics and other energy medicines and drugs.

There are hundreds of websites which sell most of these ‘important’ substances which carry far more potential for harm and none for cure.

Just one look at the website, that has impressively labeled itself as “the #1 most visited natural health site” (Mercola.com) exposes the real goal of this ‘holistic doctor-educator’ turned pill peddler—his shopping cart. This is full of products which benefits, side effects and harm for individual people with individual health needs he cannot possibly know. While, as many ‘holistic educators’ of this type, he blasts conventional medicine, pharmaceutical drugs and ‘educates’ about harm of mercury and other toxic metals, yet the ‘natural’ pharmaceuticals sold off this “#1 natural site”, contain mercury and toxic metals!

This article covers one of these, Himalayan salt, which he peddles too. I also found toxic metals listed in his ‘special’ vitamins. Just to give you another mean tip, I’ve never encountered a charlatan whose vitamins, probiotics or anything else would be less than ‘special’ or ‘highest quality’. Likely, the next ‘educational’ upgrade on a ‘natural’ site like this, will be a line of ‘holistic’ washers and dryers and natural condoms. To mention again, that since natural treatments do not even exist, anyone who promotes ‘natural’ website, pills or treatments is a red flag for a charlatan. If this breed of peddlers studied relevant sciences, such as toxicology and geology, instead of marketing tricks of fooling internet search engines how to draw bigger crowds to their shopping carts and then fool the crowds, too they would have known that real natural products can be more poisonous than unnatural. Earth, besides contaminated oceans, contains many natural poisons such as mercury, arsenic, lead, cobalt and others, whereas with unnatural products the manufacturers have far greater control in excluding toxic ingredients.

Returning to ‘important treatments,’ certain homeopathic companies taking advantage of an ‘equal opportunity’ exploitation in this field, sell no less than homeopathic structured DNA water based on some mickey-mouse study and the magic word, DNA. Many desperate and destitute parents of autistic children get embezzled $500 for some senseless set of this ‘DNA’ water packed with similar toys. The end result of this, reported to me by the few parents, as expected, none.

How does one determine what is really important to treat in disease among million of important things? By finding the right means to address those factors which deem as the most important and responsible for both diseases, themselves, and failure to reverse these. Conventional medicine has correctly referred to these as main causes of chronic diseases, which remain unknown, and inability to administer personalized treatments. As correctly emphasized by the former editor of the Journal of American Medical Association, associate professor of medicine, Lester S. King, MD, in his book Medical Thinking, the knowledge of cause, is the one that sets higher caliber scientists and doctors from those who just register consequences or shadows of causes. The causes in diseases are never singular but several and acting in a mutually sustained mode. As an example, the most popular these days entities in medicine, inflammation, gluten sensitivity, chronic infections, poor DNA methylation and malfunctioning MTHFR enzyme in spite of offering floods of impressive scientific references represent a far lower grade of science than a source pointing to their exact causes. That is why those who just specialize in inflammation, gluten sensitivity, chronic infections, malfunctioning methylation and MTHFR enzyme and other ‘important’ things never cure these. This may sound paradoxical but the way specializations in medicine are taught, narrows even more the already overly narrow approach to diseases to assure failures far more than non-specialists who embark on a far more general but prudent system approach.

James Grier Miller, MD PhD (1916‐2002)

A quote on the subject, of one of those men in medicine who was ahead of his time, the author of a lucid work, Living Systems, former Harvard University and John Hopkins University scholar, James Grier Miller MD, PhD: “The specialist languages, however, limit the horizons of thought to the borders of the discipline. They mask important intertype and interlevel generalities which exist and make general theory as difficult as it is to think about snow in a language that has no word for it.” In other words, all diseases are multisystemic, that also includes their primary causes, while specialists in both medicines focus on something localized or think of it in the foreign to disease language that ends up in apples treating oranges. This is the same as treating oranges through the language and products of apples, which are void of knowledge that is necessary for solution. The most effective way to practice system medicine is through properly addressing the causes of disease which cause both localized and systemic effects with the both being important. That is why FCT specializes in causes where a disease name is irrelevant, per se. I named this approach, in one of my articles, a non-disease treatment of diseases.

“Science consists in knowing things by their causes”
Daniel Sennert MD
(1572 – 1637)
“To know scientifically is to understand things by their causes. A man of science knows the why of things. All because the very root of word science is to know.” Lester S. King MD

This is the main reason why physicists, whose approach to problems is at the top of science pyramid in quality, always strive to approach problems at their deepest or fundamental level. They say, as physics Professor David Deutch, “depth makes it easy, breadth makes it hard.” In medicine, with its millions of findings on surface, hard actually means impossible. That is why he said, medicine needs so many specialists, because there is no end to surface with the end result of its treatments remaining the same — failure and escalating costs. Obviously, neither in conventional nor in alternative-integrative one, operating at only superficial level of breadth is not a virtue but a sign of weakness and low caliber service. Even when seemingly aiming that ‘deep’, as at a gene level, and treating hypomethylation and involved MTHFR enzyme, the truth is that this approach is as superficial as applying a bandaid to a nail. Seeking business lab and vitamin companies fool gullible alternative-integrative practitioners and patients that these are some fatalistic genetic misfortunes behind diseases which yearn ‘life saving’ pills, as B vitamins and others. Yet, in reality these are just as another superficial of symptoms as a sniffle or skin rash, with B vitamins amounting to a bandaid which is neither natural nor benign. The scientists, who understand this field far better than these practitioners, myself, labs and vitamin companies, share far less publicized but true information which also explains why my Bio-resonance testing has been finding, over the years, all these B and other vitamins as ‘healthy’ as chemotherapy. Besides the optimal therapeutic range for this supplementation being so narrow that is impossible to determine through lab tests, where undermethylation quickly turns overmethylation which leads to cancer, different tissues in the body have different methylation rate that is impossible to match pharmaceutically, neither therapeutically nor safely. Furthermore, geneticists also confirm FCT approach by pointing that both methylation and gene malfunctions are, usually, caused too by correctable causes. Among these: bad diet, poor absorption of nutrients, including B vitamins, due to intestinal infections and chemicals, damaged by antibiotics and mercury gut flora; environmental pollutants and other morbid factors. Through a sound approach, such as FCT, all of these can be corrected on an individual, not a retail basis. A large human study has registered more cancer versus a control group, when this ‘genetic’ problem was attempted to be corrected through pharmaceutical rape by B vitamins. In contrast, FCT has a documented case of recovered autistic boy whose mother refused a slew of vitamin pills recommended by DAN doctors for his malfunctioning MTHFR enzyme. I gave him none of these.

Certainly, before evolving FCT I, as all health practitioners still do, kept struggling in the past trying to figure out the difference between what both medicines deemed as ‘important’ endless targets in diseases and what science views important in solving problems. Fortunately, the answer came from my investigation of the other and even bigger paradox which still fools many, in both medicines, failures in the name of science. This concerns references to science and research to justify favorite paradigms and their treatments. But, why would science, which we normally associate with impressive technological successes, from telecommunications to space exploration, have to be a partner of failure in medicine? Little did I know that an exploration for answers to these paradoxes, plus a little luck, would lead to a discovery of a way for medicine to be finally placed on a solid scientific foundation and leave its basement level of science that dooms it to fail. The solution began to unravel through learning key fundamental steps, used by exact sciences and their based technologies to solve difficult problems.

These are: determination of the main causes of a problem and capable means to address it. These require a theory which offer these leads and explains failures. While conventional medicine does understand an importance of learning from failures by seeking their reasons, its limited paradigm or software does not have enough options to offer these. Alternative-integrative medicine neither acknowledges failures nor can explain these. The absence of proper explanations of failures makes their correction impossible.

The only general science that could offer a sound theory as to why so many seemingly important leads, tests and treatments, as in medicine, end up in failure is the science of complexity. It also opens doors to other important sciences which offer capable diagnostic tests and treatments. Its study has been intensified, lately, due to a realization that all major problems from economy to weather patterns, and social issues to biology are complex and may require a variety of sciences which deal with different aspects of complexities. Many multidisciplinary scientists including biologists and Nobel laureates assembled at the famous think tank, Santa Fe Institute to study complexity. So far, it has produced no breakthroughs in biology or medicine but this work is very important.


Alexander Bogdanov (1873 – 1928) Philosopher, physician, scientist and economist. The first to introduce systems theory and its principles for all living and nonliving structures.

Ludwig von Bertalanffy, PhD. 09/19/1901 – 06/12/1972. Biologist and philosopher. Author of General System Theory (1969) and its applications in biology and other sciences.

The Harvard Working Group: “…diseases cannot be reduced to a single cause nor explained within the prevailing linear scientific method: complexity is their hallmark.”

In the meantime the sobering reality, as stated by biology Professor Edward O. Wilson PhD, remains that: “The great majority of scientists, their moods focused narrowly on well-defined phenomena, do not care about complexity theory. Many have not yet heard of it”. Among the “many” is, virtually, the entire medical profession, except for a few self-taught.

The image below reflects the both reasons for so many things to treat in medicine, based on complexity, as well as just as many traps leading to failures in interconnected and interdependent complex systems such as the human body.

The treachery of complexity in chronic diseases and recovery

Here, thousands of cogs which represent something abnormal in disease organ, biochemical, anatomical, morphological, energetic entities, causes of these abnormalities render the aforementioned trillions of possible combinations of these to formally justify any test and treatment. The enormity of these options and traps for failure is the reason why scientists who understand complexity have referred to the work of a physician as “messy” and “impossible.”

How do you think conventional and alternative medicines choose which, out of the endless number of cogs and wheels, to treat or ignore? This question has been answered by the aforementioned book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which states that both medicines continue practicing and promoting only those cogs and wheels from the entire complex system which benefit them far more than their patients. The choice of cogs constitutes the very essence of the scientific process because any science is flooded with choices. That is why there has been an unspoken bitter pill in science, stated by renowned philosopher of science, Professor Karl Popper, PhD, that all scientific theories always carry an element of falsehood or incompleteness because they automatically exclude better choices. This could be out of ignorance, on purpose because better choices threaten the favorite paradigm, or better choices exist in nature but remain yet undiscovered by science. For the same reason, Nobel laureate in Medicine, Professor Medawar stated that any scientific paper represents an element of fraud because its convincing ‘good’ reasons are no guarantee that better ones might have been left out (“Is the scientific paper fraudulent?” On the Nature of Scientific Thought, Peter Medawar, August 1964). This is especially true within complex systems and problems as in medicine, where facts and reasons are abundant where a wrongly chosen cog to treat or its wrong treatment cause failure, and often, harm through an inevitable domino effect due to cogs and wheels being interconnected. In addition, if even most logical treatment ignores fluctuations in function of cogs due to common adverse environmental, dietary, lifestyle, and other factors including other treatments and self-treatments, a high risk of failure and harm follow. Science of complexity, under its Law of Unintended Consequences, has registered consistent poor outcomes of seemingly logical, when these aimed only at isolated ‘make sense’ targets or cogs within interconnected and interdependent systems. That is why it is only logical under the law that ‘natural’ alternative-integrative treatments are seemingly, paradoxically exceeding conventional in producing side effects, based on countless patient testimonials. The reasons are that when so many treatments and products are thrown inside interconnected system blindly, just based on some book knowledge or marketed ‘holistic’ literature which are usually detached from actual patients, the bodies of progressively weaker and sicker people (just look at the skyrocketing rates of autism, ADHD, diabetes, and allergies among children and plummeting fertility rates among young adults), cannot handle these. Among the countless examples presented in FCT webinars, seminars and their recordings is a woman who became an invalid for 18 years, until treated by FCT, after following a simple 3-day ‘colon detox program’ which, like a majority of blind ‘natural detoxes’, set the unanticipated cog wheels in motion. A young man, whose detailed ordeal is presented in webinar #60, said: “As sick as I felt before, but after that treatment, I felt that I was dying.” While these treatments are very costly and administered at the ‘best’ alternative-integrative clinics in the U.S. and Europe, after following another ‘natural’ treatment, in the ‘best’ clinic in Europe, he ended up in an intensive care unit. He remains a severe invalid and his mother who, understandably, after spending a six-digit figure out-of-pocket over the years, wanted “no more of these treatments”. Among these are Lyme ‘literate’ and similar ‘specialists’ in autism and other diseases whose treatments makes one shiver from their inflicted harm. See, also, this testimonial concerning the ‘best’ alternative-integrative clinics in the U.S. and Europe using fads with impressive names, such as the popular ‘Marshall protocol for the immune system’, in alternative medicine: https://www.yurkovsky.com/patients-corner/patient-testimonials/, Case 3 (Parts 1-5). Even a golden bullet of integrative ‘holistic’ doctors, intravenous vitamin C, has turned a young woman into an invalid for a whole year. Seven years after this ‘natural’ treatment, by the time I saw her, she has still not recovered. All of these facts are the reasons why science values most those theories which do not carry conflicts with other important knowledge, rather than just presenting all the ‘good’ reasons. Has anyone ever seen mistakes or, even, crimes being committed without a ‘reason’? (The multiple criteria for sound scientific theory, or what your teachers don’t want you to know, can be found in FCT webinar recordings 20 through 33). These, some dozen criteria take all of the hyped PR work, out of ‘scientifically based treatments’ as all of these collapse in both medicines beyond, even, two criteria. Everyone is invited to apply the same scrutiny to FCT. As it has been amply presented in FCT program, unlike a general enthusiasm on the subject of generic stimulation of the immune system this act represents a great risk to one’s health, as any generic or blind retail treatment that is administered without a regard for a person’s individual immune system. Instead, it must be carried out cautiously and under the proper guidance of Bio-resonance testing and its theory, as taught through FCT curriculum. The skeptics of this statement, besides numerous presented examples through FCT program, may refer to oncologists stating that the latest biggest hope in oncology, immunotherapy, has both failed and caused side effects.

The alternative industry and its media continue highlighting ‘good’ reasons for treating their favorite cogs and exploiting in the process both alternative-integrative practitioners and patients.

On the positive side, complexity offers a great opportunity for reversals of chronic diseases, with the simplest and inexpensive means, your proverbial “dollar return on a penny”. It is because that it allows to select from any science, as well as conventional and alternative medical specialties, the most relevant knowledge and related necessary diagnostic and therapeutic means to reverse and prevent chronic diseases through a positive domino effect, throughout the entire system, by acting just at a few key cog wheels. This equally applies to the treatment of recurrent acute diseases, most of which herald chronic diseases but are treated with short sighted symptom erasing or blocking methods, which ignore the deeper underlying causes and speed up the onset of chronic diseases. Science has always valued theories and their actions which can do more with less, by addressing a few fundamental cog wheels, over the laborious kitchen sinks. It is known as Occam’s Razor, where a few key concepts and their based actions automatically cover thousands of their dependent details.

How can complexity fulfill the general receipe of science for finding solutions?

Facing endless possible combinations “due to the enormous complexity and interplay of all possible pathological components present in chronic diseases” (Complexity and Medicine, by Professor Colin Alexander MD), science recommends, quoting Nobelist Lederberg, to look for unusual observations in relation to prevailing approaches. Following this one is to find the right means to make mistakes fast to sort out relevant options in order to get closer to a solution. The most unusual and outright stunning observations, in all medicine, are rendered by classical or original way to practice homeopathy. There one drop of water, or a pellet of a properly prescribed remedy, can take a person back in time playing back all of his deeply buried unresolved medical problems, even, since infancy. These problems as in the actual play back mode CD come and go following which a person’s health, often, dramatically improves. But, more importantly, the lessons derived from these stunning observations, known as Hering’s Law, teach us the several important concepts.

  1. Homeopathy is the single deepest medical modality, that can be likened to a medical rocket
  2. Given energetic, not pharmaceutical, nature of homeopathic remedies humans are fundamentally energetic beings who readily respond to well prescribed energetic signals when these carry high meaning in relation to their health. Note, high meaning is the one that sets highly effective energetic medical interventions from their many bandaids in energy medicine such as so called ‘Rife’, bio-photon voltage, and many other machines which purport to kill, detoxify, balance, or recharge body energy and perform other interesting activities. The key difference is that high meaning treatments meet patient’s primary body needs in defeating disease, while just energy or any other treatment mainly meet practitioners needs to dispense treatment, to make him feel useful.
  3. These deeply buried in tissues unresolved and forgotten medical problems must cause suboptimal functioning of the organs involved and health, overall, which many people take for ‘norm’, not ever knowing their true health potential. Same unresolved problems or causes also render low resistance to current and future diseases.
  4. Such therapeutic responses render the majority of other treatments unnecessary.

Concerning classical homeopathy, however, we also must note another important observation that it has been increasingly incapable of successfully treating chronic diseases in modern populations. That is why, in addition to its confounding energetic nature to pharmaceutically programmed minds, its failure to produce impressive studies in the treatment of chronic diseases has led to calls in the US, Great Britain and Russia to do away with this ‘placebo-water’. Yet, instead of following through on this stupidity-classic of throwing the baby out with the bath water we need to find a good explanation for failure first, as to why such a powerful treatment works poorly in modern populations. Obviously, space programs in the US and Soviet Union, reached their goals, following initial failures, not by producing better steam engines but by improving space rockets. Our explanation is that as rockets in the military cannot guarantee a success unless these can reach targets of high strategic importance, neither can homeopathy in spite of its deep penetrating power. For this the several conditions are to be met: a military doctrine, or medical theory which assigns a level of importance to targets, high quality intelligence gathering concerning their exact location and a capable navigation system to reach these. If we are to liken disease to an enemy, which it is, it follows that since homeopathic rockets have failed to destroy it they had to miss some important targets. How do we determine a relative degree of strategic importance of targets in disease, when these are so many? Here, instead of referring to scientific medical literature, that often serves the goal of marketing ‘important’ treatments for any target in patients’ bodies, we do just the opposite. We go to patients bodies, first, to draw observations which treatments have produced the most beneficial results after treating certain targets. When the results are very impressive and no longer artificially sustained by continuing symptom suppressive treatments through drugs, ‘natural’, machines, then we look for the corresponding scientific literature concerning the role of these targets in disease. In my observations, there was a number of patients who undertook chelation therapy for cardiovascular disease to remove heavy metals such as mercury, lead and others who, besides reporting a significant improvement in their angina, also reported a good progress in other important aspects of health. These were better energy level, overall better circulation by feeling warmer and having less pain in the legs on walking, due to improved symptoms of peripheral vascular disease, and less stiffness and better joints motion. Also, some patients even with severe neurological disorders reported good progress following intravenous mercury chelators. The scientific literature contains thousands of references concerning hundreds of diseases and symptoms associated with toxicity of mercury and other toxic metals. It also states that these metals are present in the bodies of virtually 100% of modern populations, from infancy on, and among the pathologies these cause is also suppression of the immune system, leading to infections and cancer.

Infections, too affect humans from brain to toe, can trigger and sustain any chronic disease and have been on steep rise. Examples of Lyme disease and co-infections, PANDAS, MRSA, mad cow disease or herpes are indicative of significant pathologies caused by chronic infections. The same with the great benefits of preventative role of vaccines (short of the occasions of their side effects) of serious infections. Thus, infections is another target of high strategic importance in chronic diseases.

However, on the negative side chelators, intravenous, oral and other render, also, far less positive and even negative observations, where patients either did not improve, or suffered harm. Likewise, any antimicrobial treatment may fail and, particularly, with antibiotics cause harm. The kitchen sink attempts, even when using homeopathy, of alternative-integrative medicine to overcome these flip-flop outcomes have not made the difference. The only way out is through an intelligence gathering of high quality concerning exact location of these targets in the body, how much of these still remain, following any treatment, and how to avoid a friendly fire, too. Textbooks of toxicology deem laboratory tests unfit for reliable intelligence information because the internal organs, which harbor environmental pollutants, are inaccessible to lab tests, and accessible body fluids offer poor correlation with the actual toxins in the internal organs. The same shortcomings of laboratory tests apply in a high degree to infections, as evidenced in the majority of missed Lyme, its co-infections, or parasites. Comes to rescue physics and its notion that energy fields represent a fundamental ontological level of organs and tissues, as of any matter: toxicological, infectious and other morbid agents. The diagnostic methods based on this level, Bio-resonance testing, can non-invasively directly correct with any internal organ in seconds, from brain to toe, in a virtual email mode communication. If conducted properly, it can easily establish presence of any morbid agents inside organs, which produce their illness, or malfunction before a full blown disease emerges. Thanks to this testing the inability of many detoxifying methods to properly accomplish this has become obvious, as well as their unavoidable high risk of harm by redistributing toxicological agents uncontrollably to other organs, through blood that contains high amount of these following their mobilization by chelators and other detoxifying substances. Toxicological literature warns of this, too. Likewise, the inability of antimicrobial agents to eradicate most of the chronic infections has been established beyond doubt, based on the recoveries following their FCT treatments. Once the effective intelligence gathering has been established it ends the blizzard with its hit and miss actions and detects and corrects mistakes fast. Here, Bio-resonance testing intelligence gathering, as well as patients responses to the remedies based on it, has enabled FCT to determine the high priorities or most important strategic targets in the treatment and accomplish loading and guidance of homeopathic rockets with high precision and safety.

I presented the scientific premise of Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy, based on physics, in this book, The Power of Digital Medicine, that was endorsed by the prominent physicists, Professor William A. Tiller PhD, of Stanford University, and Professor George Edgin Pugh PhD, of MIT. It also referenced a successful homeopathic research concerning detoxification of environmental pollutants and treatment and prevention of infectious diseases. All research, relevant modern medical knowledge in relation to chronic diseases and successful and safe clinical experience have led to FCT loading homeopathic rockets with different, more important and precise warheads, in comparison to 250 year-old classical homeopathic method. The exact target sites of the rocket—specific organs—which require detoxification, disinfection, revitalization of their functions or all three, as well as the power of the rocket—its effective homeopathic potency—are all addressed. Overall FCT strategy also factors in patients’ environment and lifestyle and guides accordingly to make these synergistic, instead of antagonistic to the treatment.

Here, a single measuring tool — Bio-resonance testing – is capable of noninvasively establishing the true causes of disease, making obsolete the great majority of superfluous tests and saving patients from enormous medical expenses. In one FCT webinars recording one can view an endless pile of copies of lab and imaging tests—conventional, alternative, integrative—over a decade time span. While all of these were filled with impressive looking data reporting something abnormal and followed by all sorts of treatments the patient remained just as sick. Likewise, an administration of energetically programmed water, which is the essence of homeopathy, with the information of high meaning concerning the main bullets—causes—of disease can reverse the great majority of diseases.


“Programmed water may become the next wonder drug”
The world authority on the science of water,
Professor of Bioengineering at University of Washington,
Gerald Pollack, PhD

Since the healing consequences of a positive domino effect on thousands of organs, tissues and functions, combined, is impossible to predict, all one needs to do is to skillfully extract the bullets that are the causes of the disease which unblocks the body’s ability to conduct its own self-repair. That is why I have often encountered patients reporting an improvement or disappearance of health problems which they did not initially report and for which I, sometimes, did not give any specific remedies. As a recent example, an integrative MD with Marfan’s Syndrome reported that after a single FCT treatment, an ultrasound of his chest aorta (which tends to dilate in this disease due to its weak walls and burst) showed shrinkage compared to a prior study. Yet, his FCT regimen did not contain any remedy or nutritional supplements for this disease, considered purely genetic where dilated aorta is not deemed correctable, other than by surgery. Such cases in this disease are unheard of and his regular conventional doctor was so impressed that he told him to “continue that treatment.”

As the case with this man and many other patients, whose conditions I have never treated before, another, and recent case of a young woman with gynecological problem which even her gynecologist said “I’ve never seen anything like this before,” and did not know how to treat it was cured through just two different energetic drops. I have cured several children from some mysterious syndromes, diseases, which I never heard of before. Yet, specialists who studied these for decades couldn’t. All of these are just a few practical benefits of: “depth makes it easy” over “breadth makes it hard”. Concerning main causes of diseases, in conventional medicine, these remain unknown, in alternative medicine their number and their respective tests and treatments exceeds stars in the sky. To mention a few: nutritional deficiencies, excessive fluoridation, gluten and other food allergies imbalanced energy, bad MTHFR gene, mercury, molds, biotoxins, negative emotions or just a bad immune system. However, with the exact measuring tools as skillful Bio-resonance testing, one can easily tell the difference between the notorious red herring and real causes among these. I consider myself lucky that following years of my frustrations with alternative medicine, in the past, I accidentally came across an obscure article entitled, Future Medicine Will Be Based on Controlled Energy Fields by Professor Emeritus and former chairman of the Materials Science department at Stanford University, William A. Tiller, PhD.


Professor William A. Tiller, PhD

As an expert in physics, the science that ultimately explains the fundamental nature of all matter, including living cells, and establishes its optimal measuring tools and acting forces he states that due to fundamental energetic nature of our cells energetic diagnostics such as Bio-resonance testing and energetic treatments such as homeopathy and acupuncture, are to play a primary role in medicine. However, not having a medical background, he could not be more specific or comment on the exact causes of diseases. In the end, tests and treatments, even with their utmost potential, are just tools, but it is their GPS or theory that guides them to maximizing their potential.

In addition to many other sources in physics and bio-physics, an article entitled, Is a Living System a Macroscopic Quantum System by, perhaps, the most prolific researcher in the world in bio-resonance testing and homeopathy, British physicist Cyril W. Smith, PhD, convinced me that the ignored energetic aspect of the human body holds tremendous unrealized potential in reversing chronic diseases, by determining and properly addressing their causes.


Physicist, Cyril W. Smith PhD

Finding the right diagnostic and therapeutic means

The chosen Bio-resonance test to screen internal organs for causes of their disease is a non-force version of Applied Kinesiology. In order to avoid any confusion in determining causes, only strictly specific homeopathic remedies exactly matching the potential causes detected by Bio-resonance test were used, avoiding any other treatments. The clinical response to these remedies was also correlated with diagnostic measurements of residual content of causes and served as a measuring scale to determine both their respective clinical importance in causing diseases, as well as the real power of a treatment to address these. The test also could suggest ahead of time a true benefit, or potential harm of any treatment or product, drug, nutritional supplement, herb, homeopathic etc. The scientific weight of both the testing and treatment were valued highest when the reversals of serious chronic diseases could be documented through conventional diagnostic tests. Other treatments, conventional or alternative, to just suppress symptoms were avoided. Centuries-long experience in homeopathy and personal observations proved such suppressive ‘successes’ as short-lived and, often, leading to worse diseases later on. This is just as logical as leaving a bullet inside the body and only treating multiple medical problems which it creates: immune, endocrine, gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiovascular and others. In the end, the unextracted bullet will continue wearing out and destroying the body to the point where worse diseases and premature death become unavoidable. The very essence of Hering’s law followed by recoveries, was in the body finally releasing morbid substances cemented in there, by symptoms suppressive treatments. If any treatment does not produce a Hering law it is not a true treatment, but only a suppressive bandaid. FCT produces Hering law consistently. Bio-resonance testing has also exposed serious limitations and harm of many alternative treatments: chelators, detoxifiers, binders, for Lyme, candidiasis, parasitosis, molds, as well as energetic modalities, including other types of homeopathy. Countless patient cases have confirmed this over the years, as well as the equivalent of the second law of thermodynamics in medicine, that reversals of the great majority of chronic diseases cannot be achieved with pharmaceutical treatments, either conventional or alternative. These agents lack the necessary specificity, depth and control over their actions and, therefore, are incapable of properly addressing the deep-seated, widespread and interacting causes of disease in the body. Doing this ‘naturally’ makes as much of a difference as constructing the unconstructable, self-sustained machines, using natural materials.

Speaking of the second law, it’s about time medicine is to establish one in order to stop fooling practitioners and patients with ‘new and better’ treatments and wasting enormous resources on meaningless research, tests and therapies. In creating it, FCT followed a cardinal rule in science “make your mistakes fast” (because the wrong options are so many) by drastically reducing this process through categorizing thousands of tests, treatments and products combined into general concepts. This takes away the aura of something impressive just because it is ‘new’ or ‘just discovered’, especially in alternative-integrative medicine, where these are born by the minute. But if one knows the weaknesses and strengths of a given category where a test, or a treatment belongs to then, as in a technology sector, one can easily distinguish an airborne motorcycle from a true flying vehicle as an airplane, and a cruise missile from a hot air balloon.

“A fundamental procedure in science is
to make generalizations from one system to another
on the basis of some similarity between the systems…
which permits to class them together.”

The concepts is what sets FCT apart from other ‘similar to FCT methods’, which invariably fool alternative-integrative practitioners, that is further examined in the next section. In the end an equivalent of the second law in medicine amounts to, if a medical approach is unable to diagnose and properly treat main causes of disease it, inevitably, is incapable of reversing chronic diseases and amounts to a bandaids. It is especially common for alternative-integrative practitioners to spend years on taking courses in programs and obtaining flashy certificates in treatments, most of which amount to bandaids. FCT program fully addresses this common mistake. The information following, the Distinctive Features of FCT Medical System, helps to distinguish some of these bandaids which appear to be similar to FCT.

 

Comments are closed.