The Distinctive features of the FCT medical system

The Distinctive features of the FCT medical system, which set it apart from other ‘similar’ Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy

“While it is quite reasonable for scientists to be skeptical of
new ideas that do not fit within the accepted
realm of scientific knowledge, the best science
often emerges from situations where results carefully
obtained do not fit within the accepted paradigms.”
Nobel Laureate in Medicine, Stanley Prusiner, MD

“Thank you for another excellent training. If I were to use only one treatment, this would be FCT.”
Mark Orbay, ND

“For me, by far the most helpful training has been your material. One of the huge differences between your approaches is your pursuit of excellence and application of scientific principles. You seem to be on the leading edge – at least compared to any of the rest of us.”
An alternative medical practitioner

“The complexity of FCT is what makes it powerful.” An alternative medical practitioner

There is a common misunderstanding among the alternative-integrative practitioners that there is some standard way to practice these methods, or some are good while others even better. In reality, short of classical homeopathy and traditional Chinese medicine, there are no standard ways to practice anything in alternative medicine, that certainty includes Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy where the both can be utilized in thousands of different ways. And as in the rest of alternative industry the claims of ‘better’ begin and end in marketing literature with zero proof in real practice. Bio-resonance testing, aside from many different techniques, amounts to a microphone through which one may ask a patient million questions and thousands of homeopathic remedies can be used in, even, billions of ways. The following is what sets FCT’s Bio-resonance testing and homeopathic method apart from the rest.

1. Foremost, their use is free from any conflict with other sciences and medical specialties.

2. Its general guiding theory is based on the important relevant concepts of science of complexity that allows extraction of the most useful knowledge from any scientific discipline, conventional and alternative medical specialties, in order to attain optimal results.

As emphasized in the section, WHY FCT, the entire success of any science depends on a single most important factor, a chosen theory. Indeed its guiding role is as important as one of GPS, road map or a driver’s knowledge how to arrive to point B from point A. Without this guidance a car becomes a useless piece of transportation. As the case with cars, which on the surface all look like good vehicles to get around until we learn that their GPS devices may function from 1% to 100% accuracy range, so do different Bioresonance testing methods and technologies. And the lower is the accuracy of a Bioresonance testing guiding theory, in relation to the nature of chronic disease and the necessary treatment and other measures to reverse it, the more this test becomes a logistic piece of metal.

3. Unlike other ‘similar’ interventions its diagnostic and therapeutic means are uniquely capable of effectively addressing the enormous complexity of disease, with the highest level of safety.

The reasons for this are that diagnostic and therapeutic tools, per se, are of little benefit unless their guiding theory matches the main components of a problem to be solved, ‘similar’ methods don’t. The main components consist of the primary causes of disease, malfunctioned internal organs as well as the detrimental factors in patients lifestyle and environment which sustain disease.

A few examples of FCT addressing both important targets of disease and body as a total system versus ‘similar’ methods which fail at this and just treat some isolated problems of unknown priority.

Case #1
A young woman with chronic fatigue was correctly diagnosed through Bio-resonance testing and treated homeopathically for Epstein Barr Virus. She ended up feeling much worse with her fatigue intensified and developing other debilitating symptoms. When evaluated and treated by FCT, besides this virus, as the case with all infections, other connected malfunctioned cogs and wheels were addressed also. Among, these, her vulnerability to the infection. She made a dramatic progress after a single treatment.

Case #2
A middle-aged woman, in spite of being treated, elsewhere, for a malfunctioned cog – hypothyroidism – with thyroid hormone and having normal thyroid blood tests her symptoms of seemingly low thyroid: fatigue, depression, feeling cold, missing periods, dry skin, hair loss and absent sex drive persisted. However, Bio-resonance testing detected that most of the rest of her endocrine system was malfunctioning too, due to infections, poisoning with heavy metals and environmental electromagnetic fields. All of these causes were properly addressed with a focus on synchronizing all of the involved cog wheels – thyroid and other organs – and she made a complete recovery.

Even though the following case did not involve Bio-resonance testing or homeopathic remedies, yet the great majority of practitioners who use these also prescribe numerous pills, including hormones.

In contrast, an outright tragedy took place for woman of a similar age with low thyroid function who was treated by some ‘progressive’ integrative thyroid specialist. As always the case, the treatment involved an isolated single cog approached in a simplistic pharmaceutical fashion. Following an administration of thyroid hormone, she suddenly developed extreme insomnia with weeks of sleepless nights in a row. This led to a severe depression, fatigue, a nervous breakdown and suicidal attempt for which she was admitted to a psychiatric ward and heavily sedated with multiple drugs. As usual, in all cases when neither the exact cause of malfunctioned organ nor the exact reasons for the side effects of a treatment could be determined, the prescribing doctor did not know how to undo the damage. Neither did another ‘progressive integrative’ DAN doctor, when following his treatment of an autistic child for a cog of mercury, using chelation in the same isolated blinded fashion, the boy developed a new neurological disease. FCT resolved it, virtually, in a single treatment.

4. Clear understanding of advantages and limiting features of diagnostic and therapeutic means.

There is no single field in science or a piece of technology that is free of limitations. What sets true scientists apart from enthusiasts is an awareness of limitations of their approaches. Besides many alternative practitioners taking in face value different varieties of Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy, there is also a common trend to be impressed with esoteric approaches having something to do with photons, bio-photons, something quantum, scalar, pulsing, voltage, or computer based. Yet, none of these play a token of a role in success by and of themselves, but only a capacity of a given diagnostic finding and therapeutic intervention to address the main causes of disease. If all there was to solving complex scientific problems using something quantum, photon, or computer, why haven’t physicists, who are far better at these than alternative practitioners, not been able to replace toxic expensive fossil fuels with water, or cure cancer through some photon, quantum machine? So far, whenever I questioned some of these ‘quantum’ enthusiasts, or computer based impressive interventions about proofs of their alleged superiority, the only answers I have ever received were that I was close-minded and none.

Advantages and limitations of Bio-resonance testing
Bio-resonance testing is based on the science of bio-physics or application of physics to the living and carries both great advantages and many potential limitations. These limitations can be substantially reduced, with proper awareness.

Advantages

1. Unique capacity to noninvasively energetically communicate with any internal organ and tissue to determine the true causes of disease. No other diagnostic test is capable of accomplishing this, so far.
2. It can determine the correct sequence in the treatment of detected causes, if guided by sound medical theory.
3. It can determine a necessity, or side effects, ahead of time, of any other considered treatment: drug, herbal, nutritional supplement, binder, detoxifier, chelator, homeopathic, ozone, stem cell, electromagnetic, chosen acupuncture point, or electromagnetic protective devices.

Limitations

1. Application of force, either through muscle testing in applied kinesiology, or a metal probe in EAV computerized (acupuncture according to Voll) and VEGA testings, which may distort actual readings.
2. Muscle fatigue, lack of cooperation of a patient being tested when force is applied in applied kinesiology.
3. Fluctuations in skin conductance, in EAV, or VEGA testing, due to changes in skin moisture may affect the readings.
   • FCT utilizes completely force-free type of applied kinesiology testing, based on involuntary muscle reflex response.
4. Excessive electromagnetic fields in testing room and/or through computerized testing usually distort readings.
   • FCT does not use electronic equipment and conducts testing in an EMF reduced environment, through effective Memon technology.
5. Determining treatments based on a superficial level of a problem. This is a common flaw of all of these tests that often leads to significant aggravations because treatment at this level is often followed by intensifying the body’s reaction to the undetected deeper layers of causes of disease.
   • Based on cellular biophysics, FCT tests at multiple energetic levels through specially developed diagnostic-energetic filters, to determine all relevant underlying causes at a current stage of disease, or compromised health. This also leads to a more complete and safer treatment with expedited recovery time.
6. It can determine many abnormal findings which are not relevant to disease origin and its sustenance. Among these might be vitamin, mineral and other nutritional deficiencies, foods and other allergies, energetic imbalances, dental root canal and other infections.
   • FCT focuses only on the most relevant causes of disease, based on its guiding theory of the main ‘bullets’ of diseases, as taught through its curriculum (refer to the DVD/USB: The Extremely Complex Hidden Nature of Chronic Diseases and Proper Bio-Resonance Testing, as the only Key to Unlock These). This distinction has and can only come through long, consistent and successful experience with the most serious diseases, their documented reversals, as well as, learning from correcting failures.
7. High percentage of false ‘beneficial’ treatments
   This is based on unknowingly forcing a patient to issue a positive testing response to tested ‘beneficial’ treatments due to practitioner’s inability to offer better choices, due to unawareness of these. A well-known phenomenon in quantum physics – the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox – that also plays a role in brain-to-brain energetic communi-cation or subconscious entanglement between people, explains this unspoken communi-cation. In this case, it takes place between a practitioner and a patient’s brain. This is the main reason why, as some physicists explained, it is impossible to carry out homeopathic trials using placebos, because even if a patient received one but once a homeopathic practitioner thinks of the right remedy for him, during an interview, the remedy may start working through the entanglement phenomenon. This, then, ruins the control or placebo group as a comparison subjects with those who have physically received the actual remedies. The bottom line of this phenomenon is that a patient’s brain reads the available options in a practitioner brain and settles for whatever is available. These can range, from good to terrible.
8. As a part of accepting ‘beneficial’ treatments, or being forced to, a patient may display this response to a detoxification which his organs will not be able to handle, or to a treatment of his other problem, that was offered in the wrong priority. In both cases he/she will incur more harm than benefit. Patients may also ‘accept’ treatments, in the absence of better choices, which would provide some immediate relief, such as antibiotics, colloidal silver, ozone, antifungals, probiotics, binders and other, with the delayed onset of harm.A concrete example of consenting to a ‘beneficial’ treatment that was really mediocre was demonstrated at one of my seminars. An alternative practitioner, a biological dentist, has determined through conducting Bio-resonance testing that a patient had a beneficial response to the products usually used by biological dentists and alternative practitioners for mercury detoxification. In order to avoid any element of subjectivity on my part, by testing the patient myself to FCT homeopathics for mercury detoxification, I offered him to test on his own FCT regimen on that patient.Following this, the practitioner stated that the patient’s reaction was positive to these remedies, too. I asked him, then, to re-test his initially ‘beneficial’ mercury detox products which, to his surprise, the patient immediately rejected once his body recognized a better, FCT, choice. This equally concerns EAV-computerized testing devices. Prior to having a demonstration of one of its leading brands in my office, I gave it the benefit of the doubt and contacted the “very satisfied practitioners who were getting very good results”, as stated by the manufacturer. As expected, the practitioners were getting ‘very good results’, as long as they were not familiar with the scientific criteria of good results. To my simple question concerning one of these criterion: “have you reversed a single chronic disease through this testing equipment and its recommended treatments?” the uniform answer was, “no”.The outcome of testing a popular EAV computerized device on patients in my officeIt was good 90% inaccurate, where sick organs were not diagnosed in some patients, but wrong problems were in other patients. In a patient with a significant bowel disturbance, the equipment did not detect any malfunctioned gastrointestinal organs. In a patient with multiple sclerosis, no malfunctions in the neurological system were detected either. A happy patient on the other hand, was diagnosed with depression. In spite of containing tens of thousands of pieces of data for screening and treatment options, it was obvious that the people who programmed these computers had poor knowledge of medicine. The database did not contain many necessary clinical items and treatment options consisted of ineffective and potentially harmful products. However, since my patients, who were tested by such a seemingly sophisticated technology, understandably, were very impressed by computer god, I refrained from making any negative comments and objecting to them taking the homeopathic remedies and supplements recommended by it. As expected, none of the patients experienced a positive response and in addition, the ‘depressed’ patient, instead of feeling even happier, developed a severe headache. Even while I do see its bigger potential given substantial corrections, based on FCT, but at the present time it is little more than a medical videogame to entertain and impress both practitioners and patients. The real computer scientists are aware of many limitations of these machines, as expressed by a former MIT pioneer in computer technology, Professor Marvin Minsky PhD, “No computer has ever been designed that is ever aware of what it’s doing; but most of the time, we aren’t either.” My acquaintance, retired physics professor at MIT, George E. Pugh, PhD shared with me how his computer software to conduct strategic operations for the Pentagon, during the Cold War, kept failing until he made the generals aware of limits of computers and adjust their objectives, accordingly. In September 2017, I watched on 60 minutes, the seemingly impressive most sophisticated ever computer software in conventional oncology to treat cancer. It was programmed with mega million pieces of data but only concerning the conventional view on cancer and its treatments. However, knowing the Achilles’ heel of oncology, an obsession with costly drugs and similar interventions, while ignoring and leaving inside the body the very bullets or causes of cancer – carcinogens – it was obvious that without addressing these through their proper diagnosis and treatment, this impressive project was dead on arrival. And it was, in spite of all of its fanfare and hope the treated patients, unfortunately, kept dying.
   • FCT Bio-resonance testing cannot avoid this subjective component of the testing either, where patients’ treatment choices are confined to the range of choices themselves. However, when the offered treatments are based on a sound theory and consistent successful experience, the odds of offering inferior choices are very low.

Therapeutic means and how these are different from the rest of homeopathic-energetic remedies in alternative medicine.
FCT chose homeopathic-energetic remedies as its main therapeutic modality for the following reasons:

1. Their application is based more on the selective important knowledge of conventional medicine and related important disciplines, such as toxicology, than homeopathy, per se.
   This knowledge concerns the seed of all diseases – internal organs and tissues – with their corresponding anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology and interactions.
2. It includes knowledge of the most important causative agents of disease.
   These are: infectious agents, toxicological agents or environmental pollutants, electromagnetic radiation, faulty diet, side effects of medications and substance abuse, dental treatments, physical and emotional traumas.
3. FCT remedies are highly specific in relation to malfunctioned organs in both disease and pre-disease stages, and to their causes.
   This is unlike other homeopathics, including classical, and complex homeopathy such as homotoxicology and similar haphazard homeopathic products for chronic diseases.
   The advantage of the concept of specificity has been demonstrated in conventional medicine where it is highly effective in acute infections and with vaccinations. The more exactly these corresponding measures match the actual versus similar microbes, the more effective they are. Since a violation of well-established concepts in science always backfire it is irrelevant whether it is violated by conventional, alternative, homeopathic, or 100 other medical approaches. The concrete cases presented further on this page confirm inevitability of failure when Bio-resonance testing and homeopathy violate this and other key concepts.
4. Avoidance of common supplements such as vitamins, detoxifiers, chelators, binders, immune stimulators or to ‘kill’ infections as Lyme, parasites, fungal and other.
   These are ineffective, their multiple chain reactions are impossible to know and control often cause side effects and harm, which are explained by science of hormesis. Besides, as all of the pharmaceutical band-aids, they are void of any curative potential, yet can create extra problems by containing environmental pollutants (even if, ‘organic’ or ‘best quality’) and/or induce allergic reactions to its ingredients, fillers, capsules.
5. The treatment is strictly individualized based on each patients’ unique combination of malfunctioned organs and their causes, as determined by the Bio-resonance testing.
   It addresses important clinical priorities between causes of disease, the effective and safe sequence of the remedies and their strength, and ability of many weak organs to handle the objectives of treatment, at each stage. It also provides proper guidance of patients in adjusting their environment and lifestyle from antagonistic to synergistic with the treatment.

The following are examples of common cases, where ‘similar’ to FCT interventions have failed and harmed:

Case 1
Wednesday, December 04, 2013
info@yurkovsky.com

I would like ask one more question, maybe Dr. could comment on this. You see, I had a scary experience with a Bio-resonance testing last year and I don’t want this to happen again.

Here is what happened. A Bio-resonance test was done with an Asyra device at my home. The test results made a lot of sense: according to it I would need sarcodes (RNA, joint, connective tissues, motor neurons), dental-chord to get rid of mercury etc.

But then I stupidly suggested the therapist to test quinolone frequency on me…I had no idea what might happen…the device showed green light immediately and the therapist said: “wow look at this, a nosode made from this would cure you.”

But…as crazy as it sounds, I was “poisoned” again with that frequency! Within a few minutes, I felt like in the very beginning when I was poisoned years ago, my CNS went nuts, I got intense chills, I could not focus properly etc etc.

The therapist noticed what happened and panicked – but had no idea what to do…I guess the frequency resonated with the poison in my body and those poisons started moving around. It took 3 months to recover from that.

Have you ever heard of such an experience? What do you think really happened here? Is there any risk that this could happen with this treatment?

The lessons from this case:

• Whether as it was the case in the previous example of a happy patient developing a headache from water programmed with frequencies or, in this case, of a reaction to a computer signal either one is not a placebo, but possesses a strong biological action
• Humans respond to energetic signals of programmed water, computer or even in the course of muscle testing just as a computer does to a mouse
• When these remedies and their frequencies are on target this is a blessing that leads to recovery, when off it’s a curse, as in this example
• Neither the practitioners nor the companies which program these devices know how to undo the side effects of these treatments when these occur.

Case 2
The condition of a young woman has significantly deteriorated following alternative treatments: supplements, homeopathics, intravenous chelators all of which were based on their projected benefits, beforehand, by a Bio-resonance muscle testing carried out in that office.
There were several edifying points to this case.

The patient challenged that integrative medical doctor, who specializes in Bio-resonance testing concerning its quality, since it projected these treatments as beneficial, yet were followed by a new sickness. To this, the doctor honestly admitted to not having an answer. Another point is that this particular technique, a variety of applied kinesiology has been publicized in alternative medicine as highly special because of its alleged ability to test at the level of the autonomic nervous system. Even if it did, this, per se, as at any other ‘special’ level, quantum, DNA etc., does not guarantee good quality of elicited information, or treatment in relation to the true causes of disease.

When I questioned a naturopathic doctor, who authored a big book, with this test being prominently featured, there, because she and that MD, the inventor, allegedly conducted some impressive ‘research’ to substantiate this ‘special’ test, her explanation was far less impressive. As usual in alternative medicine, she could not support the claim and even abandoned this test in her own practice.

Extending another credit to that MD for his honesty, he advised the young woman that he and his staff of naturopathic doctors did not know how to undo the side effects and referred her to FCT for that.

Case 3
An integrative osteopathic physician shared with me how exciting of a practice he ran for 30 years, using Bio-resonance testing and complex homeopathics based on a theory of homotoxicology of German physicians, Reckeweg brothers. The theory, on the surface, as all semi-truths, sounds impressive in stating that some toxins cause chronic diseases in progressing stages, and that their homeopathic formulations are supposed to regress and prevent these stages. I shared with him that, even though a theory of toxins causing disease makes good sense, but its ‘solution’ that is taught by the company which distributes these formulations represents nothing short of a reckless disregard for patients’ safety. The reasons are that this theory is very vague concerning the exact nature of these toxins, which automatically renders these homeopathic formulas as shooting in the dark, to begin with. The stages do formally exist, based on conventional medicine findings of progressive degeneration of cells, yet there is zero evidence that these remedies regress any of these stages. Worst of all, it was obvious to anyone who has studied classical homeopathy, as myself, that these homeopathics contained very powerful constitutional remedies which, besides being too nonspecific to treat any chronic disease, are prone to cause severe aggravations, due to the depth and power of their biological actions. Besides, when these aggravations persist, neither the company nor the practitioners know how to resolve these. He disagreed and said that he used Bio-resonance testing for guidance to use these remedies effectively and safely. However, as other practitioners, he admitted to having no documented evidence of reversed serious chronic diseases. Not surprising, this doctor, himself not being too old, had to retire due to severe health problems, which included two potentially fatal diseases, in spite of using these remedies. When, later on, I tested him with FCT Bio-resonance testing in my office, in spite of his practicing such ‘powerful detoxifying’ medical system, his body tested as being severely intoxicated and infected. This, unfortunately, also included his brain, which explained his visibly compromised mental function. Furthermore, at a later time, he asked me how homeopathic remedies even work. This is after 30 years of using the remedies under the ‘educational guidance’ of the company.

Case 4
Germany has been widely considered in alternative medicine as its mecca, due to its innovative technology, especially in computerized and other Bio-resonance testing technology. However, as already stated, no medical technology can shake off its foundation — a corresponding paradigm/model/theory — related to how to view disease, awareness of its primary causes and their optimal diagnosis and treatment. Many years ago when I wasn’t aware of these fundamentals, I attended the alternative medicine mecca—annual Baden-Baden Medicine Week—in Germany. But as impressed just as confused I became after looking at hundreds of machines and alternative inventory, combined, from computerized EAV and VEGA, to things delivering some special light, sound, laser and other waves, and from ingesting and infusing all sorts of things to balancing the same. There was no logistical telling what to do first and how is one better than the other. Nevertheless, every booth was handing heavy marketing literature all saying ‘this is it’. All similar displays at medical expos and professional conferences whether in the US, or elsewhere, look just as impressive and deceptive. This is like attending a world exhibition of some advanced weapons where no one really knows whether nuclear submarines are used best for water, air or street battles or tanks for ground or space ones. A few concrete examples of the price for this confusion, a few years ago I met a middle aged integrative MD, in Germany, who was implementing many of these sophisticated technologies, including computerized Bio-resonance testing in his practice and self-care. I shared my opinion with him about the serious limits of these approaches and also a concern that he did not look healthy. I suggested that he studies FCT and use it for his health, too. He, politely, ignored these. A year later I learned that he, unfortunately, died from cancer. So did at the same age, from a heart disease, a former director of the organization that trained in German computerized Bio-resonance testing technology, organized the training trips to Germany and who was an expert practitioner in this testing and use of homeopathic formulas. Unfortunately, this as all other Bio-resonance tests and homeopathics were “using the language that did not have the word snow in it”.

The information presented in this section has hopefully made its objective sufficiently clear that God has not created, unlike us people, all tests and treatments equal.

Conclusion

“Master algorithms require far less factual knowledge.”
Professor Edward O. Wilson, PhD

Both medicines have failed to deliver high quality health care in the treatment and prevention of chronic diseases. Conventional medicine due to its obsession with pharmaceuticals, alternative-integrative medicine with anything else.

Based on the important tool of science to intelligently classify and interpret produced data, FCT has adhered to the following medical algorithm.

The FCT Algorithm for Practicing Medicine